Galatians 2–3

Footnotes

1. 1 For location see ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; .
2. 2 Grk “I went up”; one always spoke idiomatically of going “up” to Jerusalem.
3. 3 Or “in accordance with.” According to κατά B.5.a.δ, “Oft. the norm is at the same time the reason, so that in accordance with and because of are merged … Instead of ‘in accordance w.’ κ. can mean simply because of, as a result of, on the basis of … κ. ἀποκάλυψιν Gal 2:2.”
4. 4 Or “set before them.”
5. 5 Grk “Gentiles, but only privately … to make sure.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started with “But” and the words “I did so,” an implied repetition from the previous clause, were supplied to make a complete English sentence.
6. 6 L&N 87.42 has “important persons, influential persons, prominent persons” for οἱ δοκοῦντες and translates this phrase in Gal 2:2 as “in a private meeting with the prominent persons.” The “prominent people” referred to here are the leaders of the Jerusalem church.
7. 7 Here the first verb (τρέχω, trechō, “was not running”) is present subjunctive, while the second (ἔδραμον, edramon, “had not run”) is aorist indicative.
8. 8 Grk “But,” translated here as “Yet” for stylistic reasons (note the use of “but” in v. 2).
9. 9 No subject and verb are expressed in vv. 4–5, but the phrase “Now this matter arose,” implied from v. 3, was supplied to make a complete English sentence.
10. 10 The adjective παρεισάκτους (pareisaktous), which relates to someone joining a group with false motives or false pretenses, applies to the “false brothers.” Although the expression “false brothers with false pretenses” is somewhat redundant, it captures the emphatic force of Paul’s expression, which labels both these “brothers” as false (ψευδαδέλφους, pseudadelphous) as well as their motives. See L&N 34.29 for more information.
11. 11 The verb translated here as “spy on” (κατασκοπέω, kataskopeō) can have a neutral nuance, but here the connotation is certainly negative (so F. F. Bruce, Galatians [], , and E. Burton, Galatians [], ).
12. 12 Grk “in order that they might enslave us.” The ἵνα (hina) clause with the subjunctive verb καταδουλώσουσιν (katadoulōsousin) has been translated as an English infinitival clause.
13. 13 Grk “slaves, nor did we …” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, οὐδέ (oude) was translated as “But … even” and a new sentence started in the translation at the beginning of v. 5.
14. 14 Or “we did not cave in to their demands.”
15. 15 Grk “even for an hour” (an idiom for a very short period of time).
16. 16 In order that the truth of the gospel would remain with you. Paul evidently viewed the demands of the so-called “false brothers” as a departure from the truth contained in the gospel he preached. This was a very serious charge (see Gal 1:8).
17. 17 Or “influential leaders.” δοκέω 2.a.β has “the influential men Gal 2:2, 6b. A fuller the same mng., inf. added … vss. 6a, 9.” This refers to the leadership of the Jerusalem church.
18. 18 Grk “God does not receive the face of man,” an idiom for showing favoritism or partiality ( πρόσωπον 1.b.α; L&N 88.238).
19. 19 Or “influential people”; here “leaders” was used rather than “people” for stylistic reasons, to avoid redundancy with the word “people” in the previous parenthetical remark. See also the note on the word “influential” at the beginning of this verse.
20. 20 Or “contributed.” This is the same word translated “go to ask advice from” in 1:16, but it has a different meaning here; see L&N 59.72.
21. 21 Or “added nothing to my authority.” Grk “added nothing to me,” with what was added (“message,” etc.) implied.
22. 22 The participle ἰδόντες (idontes) has been taken temporally to retain the structure of the passage. Many modern translations, because of the length of the sentence here, translate this participle as a finite verb and break the Greek sentences into several English sentences (, for example, begins new sentences at the beginning of both vv. 8 and 9).
23. 23 Grk “to the uncircumcision,” that is, to the Gentiles.
24. 24 Grk “to the circumcision,” a collective reference to the Jewish people.
25. 25 Or “worked through”; the same word is also used in relation to Paul later in this verse.
26. 26 Or “his ministry as an apostle.”
27. 27 Grk “to the circumcision,” i.e., the Jewish people.
28. 28 Grk “also empowered me to the Gentiles.”
29. 29 Cephas. This individual is generally identified with the Apostle Peter (L&N 93.211).
30. 30 Or “who were influential as,” or “who were reputed to be.” See also the note on the word “influential” in .
31. 31 Pillars is figurative here for those like James, Peter, and John who were leaders in the Jerusalem church.
32. 32 The participle γνόντες (gnontes) has been taken temporally. It is structurally parallel to the participle translated “when they saw” in v. 7.
33. 33 Grk “me and Barnabas.”
34. 34 Grk “so,” with the ἵνα (hina) indicating the result of the “pillars” extending the “right hand of fellowship,” but the translation “they gave … the right hand of fellowship so that we would go” could be misunderstood as purpose here. The implication of the scene is that an agreement, outlined at the end of v. 10, was reached between Paul and Barnabas on the one hand and the “pillars” of the Jerusalem church on the other.
35. 35 Grk “to the circumcision,” a collective reference to the Jewish people.
36. 36 Grk “only that we remember the poor”; the words “They requested” have been supplied from the context to make a complete English sentence.
37. 37 Cephas. This individual is generally identified with the Apostle Peter (L&N 93.211).
38. 38 For location see ; ; ; .
39. 39 Grk “because he stood condemned.”
40. 40 The conjunction γάρ has not been translated here.
41. 41 Grk “he drew back.” If ἑαυτόν (heauton) goes with both ὑπέστελλεν (hupestellen) and ἀφώριζεν (aphōrizen) rather than only the latter, the meaning would be “he drew himself back” (see ὑποστέλλω 1.a).
42. 42 Or “and held himself aloof.”
43. 43 Grk “the [ones] of the circumcision,” that is, the group of Jewish Christians who insisted on circumcision of Gentiles before they could become Christians.
44. 44 The words “with them” are a reflection of the σύν- (sun-) prefix on the verb συναπήχθη (sunapēchthē; see L&N 31.76).
45. 45 Cephas. This individual is generally identified with the Apostle Peter (L&N 93.211).
46. 46 Here ἀναγκάζεις (anankazeis) has been translated as a conative present (see ).
47. 47 Grk “by nature.”
48. 48 Grk “and not sinners from among the Gentiles.”
49. 49 Grk “yet knowing”; the participle εἰδότες (eidotes) has been translated as a finite verb due to requirements of contemporary English style.
50. 50 Grk “no man,” but ἄνθρωπος (anthrōpos) is used here in a generic sense, referring to both men and women.
51. 51 The law is a reference to the law of Moses.
52. 52 Or “faith in Jesus Christ.” A decision is difficult here. Though traditionally translated “faith in Jesus Christ,” an increasing number of NT scholars are arguing that πίστις Χριστοῦ (pistis Christou) and similar phrases in Paul (here and in v. 20; Rom 3:22, 26; Gal 3:22; Eph 3:12; Phil 3:9) involve a subjective genitive and mean “Christ’s faith” or “Christ’s faithfulness” (cf., e.g., G. Howard, “The ‘Faith of Christ’,” 85 [1974]: 212–15; R. B. Hays, The Faith of Jesus Christ []; Morna D. Hooker, “Πίστις Χριστοῦ,” 35 [1989]: 321–42). Noteworthy among the arguments for the subjective genitive view is that when πίστις takes a personal genitive it is almost never an objective genitive (cf. Matt 9:2, 22, 29; Mark 2:5; 5:34; 10:52; Luke 5:20; 7:50; 8:25, 48; 17:19; 18:42; 22:32; Rom 1:8; 12; 3:3; 4:5, 12, 16; 1 Cor 2:5; 15:14, 17; 2 Cor 10:15; Phil 2:17; Col 1:4; 2:5; 1 Thess 1:8; 3:2, 5, 10; 2 Thess 1:3; Titus 1:1; Phlm 6; 1 Pet 1:9, 21; 2 Pet 1:5). On the other hand, the objective genitive view has its adherents: A. Hultgren, “The Pistis Christou Formulations in Paul,” 22 (1980): 248–63; J. D. G. Dunn, “Once More, ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ,” Seminar Papers, 1991, 730–44. Most commentaries on Romans and Galatians usually side with the objective view. On the phrase translated the faithfulness of Christ, , which notes that the grammar is not decisive, nevertheless suggests that “the faith/faithfulness of Christ is not a denial of faith in Christ as a Pauline concept (for the idea is expressed in many of the same contexts, only with the verb πιστεύω rather than the noun), but implies that the object of faith is a worthy object, for he himself is faithful.” Though Paul elsewhere teaches justification by faith, this presupposes that the object of our faith is reliable and worthy of such faith.
53. 53 In Greek this is a continuation of the preceding sentence, but the construction is too long and complex for contemporary English style, so a new sentence was started here in the translation.
54. 54 Or “by faith in Christ.” See comment above on “the faithfulness of Jesus Christ.”
55. 55 Or “no human being”; Grk “flesh.”
56. 56 Or “does Christ serve the interests of sin?”; or “is Christ an agent for sin?” See διάκονος 2.
57. 57 Or “once tore down.”
58. 58 Traditionally, “that I am a transgressor.”
59. 59 Both the / Greek text and the place the phrase “I have been crucified with Christ” at the end of v. 19, but most English translations place these words at the beginning of v. 20.
60. 60 Here δέ (de) has been translated as “So” to bring out the connection of the following clauses with the preceding ones. What Paul says here amounts to a result or inference drawn from his co-crucifixion with Christ and the fact that Christ now lives in him. In Greek this is a continuation of the preceding sentence, but the construction is too long and complex for contemporary English style, so a new sentence was started here in the translation.
61. 61 Grk “flesh.”
62. 62 A number of important witnesses (𝔓46 B D* F G) have θεοῦ καὶ Χριστοῦ (theou kai Christou, “of God and Christ”) instead of υἱοῦ τοῦ θεοῦ (huiou tou theou, “the Son of God”), found in the majority of , including several important ones (א A C D1 Ψ 0278 33 1739 1881 𝔐 lat sy co). The construction “of God and Christ” appears to be motivated as a more explicit affirmation of the deity of Christ (following as it apparently does the Granville Sharp rule). Although Paul certainly has an elevated Christology, explicit “God-talk” with reference to Jesus does not normally appear until the later books (cf., e.g., Titus 2:13, Phil 2:10–11, and probably Rom 9:5). For different arguments but the same textual conclusions, see . Or “I live by faith in the Son of God.” See note on “faithfulness of Jesus Christ” in v. for the rationale behind the translation “the faithfulness of the Son of God.” On the phrase because of the faithfulness of the Son of God, , which notes that the grammar is not decisive, nevertheless suggests that “the faith/faithfulness of Christ is not a denial of faith in Christ as a Pauline concept (for the idea is expressed in many of the same contexts, only with the verb πιστεύω rather than the noun), but implies that the object of faith is a worthy object, for he himself is faithful.” Though Paul elsewhere teaches justification by faith, this presupposes that the object of our faith is reliable and worthy of such faith.
63. 63 Or “I do not declare invalid,” “I do not nullify.”
64. 64 Or “justification.”
65. 65 Or “without cause,” “for no purpose.”
66. 1 Grk “O” (an interjection used both in address and emotion). In context the following section is highly charged emotionally.
67. 2 Or “deceived”; the verb βασκαίνω (baskainō) can be understood literally here in the sense of bewitching by black magic, but could also be understood figuratively to refer to an act of deception (see L&N 53.98 and 88.159).
68. 3 Or “publicly placarded,” “set forth in a public proclamation” ( προγράφω 2).
69. 4 Grk “by [the] works of [the] law,” a reference to observing the Mosaic law.
70. 5 Grk “by [the] hearing of faith.”
71. 6 Grk “Having begun”; the participle ἐναρξάμενοι (enarxamenoi) has been translated concessively.
72. 7 Or “by the Spirit.”
73. 8 The verb ἐπιτελεῖσθε (epiteleisthe) has been translated as a conative present (see ). This is something the Galatians were attempting to do, but could not accomplish successfully.
74. 9 Grk “in/by [the] flesh.”
75. 10 Or “provide.”
76. 11 Grk “by [the] works of [the] law” (the same phrase as in v. 2).
77. 12 Grk “by [the] hearing of faith” (the same phrase as in v. 2).
78. 13 A quotation from Gen 15:6.
79. 14 Grk “know.”
80. 15 The phrase “sons of Abraham” is used here in a figurative sense to describe people who are connected to a personality, Abraham, by close nonmaterial ties. It is this personality that has defined the relationship and its characteristics ( υἱός 2.c.α).
81. 16 For the Greek verb προευαγγελίζομαι (proeuangelizomai) translated as “proclaim the gospel ahead of time,” compare L&N 33.216.
82. 17 The same plural Greek word, τὰ ἔθνη (ta ethnē), can be translated as “nations” or “Gentiles.”
83. 18 A quotation from Gen 12:3; 18:18.
84. 19 Grk “those who are by faith,” with the Greek expression “by faith” (ἐκ πίστεως, ek pisteōs) the same as the expression in v. 8.
85. 20 Grk “For as many as.”
86. 21 Grk “Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all the things written in the book of the law, to do them.” A quotation from Deut 27:26.
87. 22 Or “The one who is righteous by faith will live” (a quotation from Hab 2:4).
88. 23 Grk “is not from faith.”
89. 24 Grk “who does these things”; the referent (the works of the law, see 3:5) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
90. 25 A quotation from Lev 18:5. The phrase the works of the law is an editorial expansion on the Greek text (see previous note); it has been left as normal typeface to indicate it is not part of the OT text.
91. 26 Grk “having become”; the participle γενόμενος (genomenos) has been taken instrumentally.
92. 27 A quotation from Deut 21:23. By figurative extension the Greek word translated tree (ζύλον, zulon) can also be used to refer to a cross (L&N 6.28), the Roman instrument of execution.
93. 28 Or “so that the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles in Christ Jesus.”
94. 29 Grk “brothers.” See note on the phrase “brothers and sisters” in .
95. 30 Grk “I speak according to man,” referring to the illustration that follows.
96. 31 The same Greek word, διαθήκη (diathēkē), can mean either “covenant” or “will,” but in this context the former is preferred here because Paul is discussing in vv. 16–18 the Abrahamic covenant.
97. 32 Or “has been put into effect.”
98. 33 Grk “his seed,” a figurative extension of the meaning of σπέρμα (sperma) to refer to descendants (L&N 10.29).
99. 34 Grk “It”; the referent (the scripture) has been specified in the translation for clarity. The understood subject of the verb λέγει (legei) could also be “He” (referring to God) as the one who spoke the promise to Abraham.
100. 35 Grk “to seeds.” See the note on “descendant” earlier in this verse. Here the term is plural; the use of the singular in the OT text cited later in this verse is crucial to Paul’s argument.
101. 36 See the note on “descendant” earlier in this verse. A quotation from Gen 12:7; 13:15; 17:7; 24:7.
102. 37 Most (D F G I 0176 0278 𝔐 it sy) read “ratified by God in Christ” whereas the omission of “in Christ” is the reading in 𝔓46 א A B C P Ψ 6 33 81 1175 1739 1881 2464 co. The shorter reading is strongly supported by the evidence, and it is probable that a copyist inserted the words as an interpretive gloss. However, this form of the “in Christ” expression is somewhat atypical in the corpus Paulinum (εἰς Χριστόν [eis Christon] rather than ἐν Χριστῷ [en Christō]), a fact which tempers one’s certainty about the shorter reading. Nevertheless, the expression is used more in Galatians than in any other of Paul’s letters (Gal 2:16; 3:24, 27), and may have been suggested by such texts to early copyists.
103. 38 On the translation “graciously gave” for χαρίζομαι (charizomai) see L&N 57.102.
104. 39 Grk “Why then the law?”
105. 40 For προσετέθη (prosetethē) several Western have ἐτέθη (etethē, “it was established”; so D* F G it Irlat Ambst Spec). The net effect of this reading, in conjunction with the largely Western reading of πράξεων (praxeōn) for παραβάσεων (parabaseōn), seems to be a very positive assessment of the law. But there are compelling reasons for rejecting this reading: (1) externally, it is provincial and relatively late; (2) internally: (a) transcriptionally, there seems to be a much higher transcriptional probability that a scribe would try to smooth over Paul’s harsh saying here about the law than vice versa; (b) intrinsically: [1] Paul has already argued that the law came after the promise (vv. 15–18), indicating, more than likely, its temporary nature; [2] the verb “was added” in v. 19 (προσετέθη) is different from the verb in v. 15 (ἐπιδιατάσσεται, epidiatassetai); virtually all exegetes recognize this as an intentional linguistic shift on Paul’s part in order not to contradict his statement in v. 15; [3] the temper of 3:1–4:7 is decidedly against a positive statement about the Torah’s role in Heilsgeschichte.
106. 41 παραδόσεων (paradoseōn; “traditions, commandments”) is read by D*, while the vast majority of witnesses read παραβάσεων (parabaseōn, “transgressions”). D’s reading makes little sense in this context. πράξεων (praxeōn, “of deeds”) replaces παραβάσεων in 𝔓46 F G it Irlat Ambst Spec. The wording is best taken as going with νόμος (nomos; “Why then the law of deeds?”), as is evident by the consistent punctuation in the later witnesses. But such an expression is unpauline and superfluous; it was almost certainly added by some early scribe(s) to soften the blow of Paul’s statement.
107. 42 Grk “the seed.” See the note on the first occurrence of the word “descendant” in .
108. 43 Or “was ordered.” L&N 31.22 has “was put into effect” here.
109. 44 Many modern translations (, , ) render this word (μεσίτης, mesitēs; here and in v. 20) as “mediator,” but this conveys a wrong impression in contemporary English. If this is referring to Moses, he certainly did not “mediate” between God and Israel but was an intermediary on God’s behalf. Moses was not a mediator, for example, who worked for compromise between opposing parties. He instead was God’s representative to his people who enabled them to have a relationship, but entirely on God’s terms.
110. 45 The meaning of this verse is disputed. According to μεσίτης, “It prob. means that the activity of an intermediary implies the existence of more than one party, and hence may be unsatisfactory because it must result in a compromise. The presence of an intermediary would prevent attainment, without any impediment, of the purpose of the εἶς θεός in giving the law.” See also A. Oepke, 4:598–624, esp. 618–19.
111. 46 The reading τοῦ θεοῦ (tou theou, “of God”) is well attested in א A C D (F G read θεοῦ without the article) Ψ 0278 33 1739 1881 𝔐 lat sy co. However, 𝔓46 B d Ambst lack the words. 𝔓46 and B perhaps should not to be given as much weight as they normally are, since the combination of these two witnesses often produces a secondary shorter reading against all others. In addition, one might expect that if the shorter reading were original other variants would have crept into the textual tradition early on. But 104 (a.d. 1087) virtually stands alone with the variant τοῦ Χριστοῦ (tou Christou, “of Christ”). Nevertheless, if τοῦ θεοῦ were not part of the original text, it is the kind of variant that would be expected to show up early and often, especially in light of Paul’s usage elsewhere (Rom 4:20; 2 Cor 1:20). A slight preference should be given to the τοῦ θεοῦ over the omission. rightly places the words in brackets, indicating doubts as to their authenticity.
112. 47 Or “have been based on the law.”
113. 48 Or “locked up.”
114. 49 Grk “imprisoned all things” but τὰ πάντα (ta panta) includes people as part of the created order. Because people are the emphasis of Paul’s argument (“given to those who believe” at the end of this verse.), “everything and everyone” was used here.
115. 50 Or “so that the promise could be given by faith in Jesus Christ to those who believe.” A decision is difficult here. Though traditionally translated “faith in Jesus Christ,” an increasing number of NT scholars are arguing that πίστις Χριστοῦ (pistis Christou) and similar phrases in Paul (here and in Rom 3:22, 26; Gal 2:16, 20; Eph 3:12; Phil 3:9) involve a subjective genitive and mean “Christ’s faith” or “Christ’s faithfulness” (cf., e.g., G. Howard, “The ‘Faith of Christ’,” 85 [1974]: 212–15; R. B. Hays, The Faith of Jesus Christ []; Morna D. Hooker, “Πίστις Χριστοῦ,” 35 [1989]: 321–42). Noteworthy among the arguments for the subjective genitive view is that when πίστις takes a personal genitive it is almost never an objective genitive (cf. Matt 9:2, 22, 29; Mark 2:5; 5:34; 10:52; Luke 5:20; 7:50; 8:25, 48; 17:19; 18:42; 22:32; Rom 1:8; 12; 3:3; 4:5, 12, 16; 1 Cor 2:5; 15:14, 17; 2 Cor 10:15; Phil 2:17; Col 1:4; 2:5; 1 Thess 1:8; 3:2, 5, 10; 2 Thess 1:3; Titus 1:1; Phlm 6; 1 Pet 1:9, 21; 2 Pet 1:5). On the other hand, the objective genitive view has its adherents: A. Hultgren, “The Pistis Christou Formulations in Paul,” 22 (1980): 248–63; J. D. G. Dunn, “Once More, ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ,” Seminar Papers, 1991, 730–44. Most commentaries on Romans and Galatians usually side with the objective view. On the phrase because of the faithfulness of Jesus Christ, , which notes that the grammar is not decisive, nevertheless suggests that “the faith/faithfulness of Christ is not a denial of faith in Christ as a Pauline concept (for the idea is expressed in many of the same contexts, only with the verb πιστεύω rather than the noun), but implies that the object of faith is a worthy object, for he himself is faithful.” Though Paul elsewhere teaches justification by faith, this presupposes that the object of our faith is reliable and worthy of such faith.
116. 51 Or “the faithfulness [of Christ] came.”
117. 52 Instead of the present participle συγκλειόμενοι (sunkleiomenoi; found in 𝔓46 א A B D* F G P Ψ 33 1739 ), C D1 0176 0278 𝔐 have the perfect συγκεκλεισμένοι (sunkekleismenoi). The syntactical implication of the perfect is that the cause or the means of being held in custody was confinement (“we were held in custody [by/because of] being confined”). The present participle of course allows for such options, but also allows for contemporaneous time (“while being confined”) and result (“with the result that we were confined”). Externally, the perfect participle has little to commend it, being restricted for the most part to later and Byzantine witnesses. Grk “being confined.”
118. 53 Or “disciplinarian,” “custodian,” or “guide.” According to παιδαγωγός, “the man, usu. a slave … whose duty it was to conduct a boy or youth … to and from school and to superintend his conduct gener.; he was not a ‘teacher’ (despite the present mng. of the derivative ‘pedagogue’ … When the young man became of age, the π. was no longer needed.” L&N 36.5 gives “guardian, leader, guide” here.
119. 54 Or “be justified.”
120. 55 See the note on the word “guardian” in v. . The punctuation of vv. 25, 26, and 27 is difficult to represent because of the causal connections between each verse. English style would normally require a comma either at the end of v. 25 or v. 26, but in so doing the translation would then link v. 26 almost exclusively with either v. 25 or v. 27; this would be problematic as scholars debate which two verses are to be linked. Because of this, the translation instead places a period at the end of each verse. This preserves some of the ambiguity inherent in the Greek and does not exclude any particular causal connection.
121. 56 Or “For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus.”
122. 57 Grk “For as many of you as.”
123. 58 See the note on the word “slave” in .
124. 59 Grk “male and female.”
125. 60 Grk “seed.” See the note on the first occurrence of the word “descendant” in .