Loading…
Faithlife Study Bible
Restore columns
Exit Fullscreen

19:1–21:25 The closing narrative of the book of Judges is the most graphic in its depiction of the lawlessness that existed during the time before the monarchy. These final chapters are clearly designed to portray the tribe of Benjamin in a negative light and to subtly contrast Ephraim with Judah (see note on Judg 19:1; note on v. 25).

The story contains frequent echoes of earlier narratives while foreshadowing events in 1 Samuel. For example, the story of the Levite and his concubine in ch. 19 fits the general outline of the events leading up to the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah in Gen 19. Also, the calling of an assembly at Mizpah and the focus on Gibeah foreshadow the importance of those places in 1 Sam 10. The Levite’s action of summoning Israel by sending a body part to each tribe is paralleled by Saul’s symbolic message summoning Israel in 1 Sam 11. The ensuing battle in Judg 20 reflects a strategy reminiscent of Joshua’s conquest of Ai in Josh 8.

19:1 days there was no king in Israel See note on Judg 17:6.

a man, a Levite Not the one from 18:30.

a concubine A woman who was a sexual partner and part of the man’s household but with a social status below that of a wife.

from Bethlehem in Judah The contrast between Ephraim and Judah is evident in the narrative’s identification of the home territories of the Levite and the concubine. The woman is from Bethlehem, the hometown of David.

19:2 felt repugnance toward him The nature of the concubine’s action described here is unclear due to multiple options for how to read the Hebrew text. The Hebrew verb used here, zanah, is a common word for describing sexual immorality (Gen 38:24; Josh 6:22). However, the Septuagint, the ancient Greek translation of the ot, says that the woman became angry with the Levite, reading a homonym for zanah that means to become angry or hate.

19:3 and he went after her Whether the Levite is here motivated by guilt, some perceived wrong of his own, or some other reason is unclear. In any case, he wants his concubine to return.

was glad to meet him Either the Levite and the concubine’s father enjoy a good personal relationship, or the father wants his daughter restored to a stable relationship—or both. Marital breakup was a social disgrace.

19:4 to stay with him three days Such hospitality was common in ancient Near Eastern culture; inhospitality was a cause for shame (compare Judg 19:17–23).

Entertain ISBE

19:5 Refresh yourself with a bit of The hospitality is extended. See v. 4 and note.

19:7 he returned and spent the night there The hospitality is prolonged yet again. See v. 4 and note.

19:9 You can rise early tomorrow The concubine’s father wants to extend hospitality a third time, a gesture that conformed to cultural norms. See v. 4 and note.

19:10 that is, Jerusalem Jebus was an ancient name for Jerusalem (or a settlement very close to it) prior to David’s capture of the city. The Jebusites were among the native peoples of Canaan (Gen 10:16). Other passages apparently equate Jebus with Jerusalem (Josh 15:8; 18:28; compare 2 Sam 5:6–9; 24:18–25).

The uncertainty over Jebus’ identification with Jerusalem derives primarily from the fact that Jebus, though showing up in the boundary lists of Judah and Benjamin (Josh 15:5b–11; 18:15–19), is not listed within the inheritance of Benjamin (Josh 18:15–19). No other ancient Near Eastern texts mention Jebus, so its origins are unknown.

Jebus HBD

Jerusalem DOT: HB

19:12 we will cross over up to Gibeah The Levite either favors staying in a town inhabited by fellow Israelites, perhaps because he thinks it will be safer, or is motivated by ethnic bigotry against the foreign Jebusites (see note on Judg 19:10).

19:13 in Gibeah or in Ramah Gibeah (not to be confused with Gibeon) was about four miles beyond Jebus, and Ramah was near Gibeah. Both cities were within Benjaminite territory (vv. 14, 16). Gibeah was a central location in Saul’s disastrous rule (see 1 Sam 9–14).

Gibeah DOT: HB

19:14 beside Gibeah, which belongs to Benjamin See Judg 19:13 and note. See note on 17:1–13.

19:15 in the open square of the city Finding someone who would accommodate strangers could be expected given the cultural norms for hospitality (see v. 4 and note). But having snubbed the Gentile city of Jebus as an option, the Levite finds his fellow Israelites less than hospitable.

19:18 Yahweh’s house It is unclear why the Levite would reference visiting Shiloh (or Bethel), where it seems the ark of the covenant was kept (18:31; 20:18). This may be why the Septuagint, the ancient Greek translation of the ot, reads “my house” instead (compare v. 29).

19:19 there is no lack of anything The Levite will not be a burden to anyone offering shelter.

19:20 you must not spend the night An echo of Lot’s urgency to ensure the safety of the two visitors to Sodom (who were angels; Gen 19:1–2).

19:22–30 The account draws on the episode of Sodom in Gen 19. The two stories contain the same number of words and share common vocabulary. This story shows that Gibeah of Benjamin had become like Sodom.

19:22 Bring out the man See Gen 19:7.

19:24 his concubine Lot similarly offered his two daughters to the men of Sodom.

Do not do this disgraceful thing The cultural expectations related to hospitality demanded the Levite’s protection and safety.

The rest of the tribes were appalled by the Benjaminites’ savagery toward the concubine (Judg 19:28–30; ch. 20). Judges 21:25 reminds readers that there was no king to police such matters. This incident legitimizes the office of kingship and Judah’s Davidic dynasty (see note on 17:6).

19:25 men were not willing to listen See Gen 19:9.

they abused her all night This horrific act casts both the tribes of Ephraim and Benjamin in a dishonorable light. The victim—the concubine—is from Judah, while the men who offer the innocent women are from Ephraim; the men who perpetuate the crime are from Benjamin (Judg 19:1, 14, 16, 22, 24).

19:28 but there was no answer Nothing indicates remorse.

So he put her on the donkey It is unclear whether the concubine is already dead. In view of v. 29, she is dead by the time the Levite returns to Bethlehem.

19:29 throughout the whole territory of Israel It seems that the Levite does this hideous act to prove the truthfulness of his story and prompt others to action (20:4–7).

19:30 Take note of it Suggests that the Levite sent a message with the pieces of the corpse. This explains how the tribes knew where to meet in ch. 20.

FSB

About Faithlife Study Bible

Faithlife Study Bible (FSB) is your guide to the ancient world of the Old and New Testaments, with study notes and articles that draw from a wide range of academic research. FSB helps you learn how to think about interpretation methods and issues so that you can gain a deeper understanding of the text.

Copyright

Copyright 2012 Logos Bible Software.

Support Info

fsb

Table of Contents