Jeremiah 8:11–15

Footnotes

1. 27 Heb “daughter of my people.” For the translation given here see 4:11 and the note on the phrase “dear people” there.
2. 28 Heb “They heal the wound of my people lightly.”
3. 29 Heb “They say, ‘Peace! Peace!’ and there is no peace!”
4. 30 Heb “They will fall among the fallen.”
5. 31 Or “I will completely destroy them.” The translation which is adopted is based on the revocalization of the which appears to mean literally “gathering I will sweep them away,” a rather improbable grammatical combination. It follows the suggestion found in סוּף (Hiph) of reading אֹסֵף אֲסִיפָם (’ose, a first singular Qal imperfect of אָסַף [’asaf] followed by a noun אָסִיף [’asif] with possessive suffix) instead of the ’s אָסֹף אֲסִיפֵם (’aspf ’asifem, a Qal infinitive absolute of אָסַף [’asaf] followed by the Hiphil imperfect of סוּף [suf] plus suffix). For parallel usage of the verb אָסַף (asaf) see 62 אָסַף Qal.4, and for a similar form of the verb see Mic 4:6. The alternate translation follows the suggestion in 692 סוּף Hiph: אָסֹף (’asof) is to be interpreted as a form of the Hiphil infinitive absolute (הָסֵף [hasef] would be expected) chosen for assonance with the following form. This suggestion would gain more credence if the is to be retained in Zeph 1:2 where parallel forms are found. However, that text too has been questioned on lexical and grammatical grounds. The translation adopted fits the following context better than the alternate one and is based on less questionable lexical and grammatical parallels. The Greek translation which reads “they shall gather their fruits” supports the translation chosen.
6. 32 The meaning of this line is very uncertain. A possible alternate translation is: “They have broken the laws that I gave them.” The line reads rather literally “And I gave them they passed over them.” The translation adopted treats the first expression as a noun clause (cf. §155.n) which is the subject of the following verb, i.e., “the things I gave them [contextually, the grapes, etc.] passed over from them.” The alternate translation treats the expression as a dangling object (a Hebrew casus pendens) resumed by the pronoun “them” and understands “the things that I gave them” to be the law or some related entity which is often the object of this verb (see 717 עָבַר Qal.1.i). Neither of these translations is without its weakness. The weakness of the translation which has been adopted is the unusual use it assigns to the object suffix of the verb translated “pass over.” The weakness of the alternate translation is the rather abrupt and opaque introduction of a new topic of reference (i.e., the laws) into the context. On the whole the latter weakness would appear to outweigh the former. This line is missing from the Greek version and J. Bright (Jeremiah []) and J. A. Thompson (Jeremiah []) despair of giving a translation. For other possible suggestions see, W. L. Holladay, Jeremiah (Hermeneia), 1:.
7. 33 The words “The people say” are not in the text but are implicit in the shift of speakers between vv. 4–13 and vv. 14–16. They are supplied in the translation for clarity.
8. 34 Heb “Gather together and let us enter into the fortified cities.”
9. 35 Heb “Let us die there.” The words “at least” and “fighting” are intended to bring out the contrast of passive surrender to death in the open country and active resistance to the death implicit in the context.
10. 36 The words “of judgment” are not in the text but are intended to show that “poison water” is not literal but figurative of judgment at the hands of God through the agency of the enemy mentioned in v. 16.
11. 37 Heb “against the Lord.” The switch is for the sake of smoothness in English.
12. 38 Heb “[We hoped] for a time of healing but behold terror.”