Loading…
Faithlife Study Bible
Restore columns
Exit Fullscreen

9:1–13 Paul addresses the implications of God’s fulfillment of His promises among non-Jewish people (the Gentiles) and Israel’s unbelief. He begins by declaring his anguish for his fellow people (vv. 1–5). He will address the question of their future place in God’s plans in ch. 11. Paul rejects the possibility that Israel’s denial of the gospel means that God’s promises have failed and that God is therefore unjust (vv. 6–11).

9:1 in Christ Paul speaks as one who belongs to Christ and has experienced God’s promises.

9:2 distress in my heart The Greek word used here, odynē, can refer to physical or mental pain. Despite his role as apostle to the Gentiles (11:13), Paul is still grieved that his fellow Jews, God’s chosen people through His promises to Abraham, have not widely accepted Jesus as their Messiah.

9:3 could wish myself to be accursed Paul echoes Moses’ prayer in Exod 32:32, showing solidarity with his people by wishing to share in their punishment or take the punishment for them. He longs for the salvation of his fellow Jews.

Anathema Word Study

9:4 who are Israelites Paul describes six benefits or privileges that rightfully belonged to Israel as God’s chosen people: joining God’s family (adoption), experiencing His presence (glory), entering into relationship with Him (covenants), receiving His revelation (law), worshiping at His temple (service), and inheriting His blessings (promises).

the adoption The ot uses the metaphor of adoption to describe Yahweh’s selection of Israel as His chosen people (Exod 4:22–23; Hos 11:1). See note on Gal 4:5. The concept of adoption was also applied to the Davidic king in the ot (Pss 2:7; 89:27).

the glory Probably an allusion to Yahweh’s visible presence among the Israelites (see Exod 16:10; see note on Isa 6:3). God made His presence known at the tabernacle (Exod 25:8; 40:34) and later the temple (1 Kgs 8:11; Ezek 43:2). Isaiah interpreted this “glory as the Holy Spirit among them (Isa 63:11). The Greek word for glory is doxa.

Since Paul is listing the special privileges due to Israel as God’s chosen people, he probably uses “glory” in its ot sense of referring to the kavod, or divine presence. However, Paul’s usage of “glory” earlier in Romans sometimes has a future-oriented sense—looking ahead to the time of blessing in the age to come (compare Rom 5:2; 8:17–18).

Romans 9:4 NICNT Ro

Doxa Word Study

covenants Referring to the various covenants established in the ot (e.g., Noah in Gen 9, Abraham in Gen 15; 17, Israel in Exod 19–24, and David in 2 Sam 7:1–27 [compare 2 Sam 23:5]).

The biblical concept of covenant is usually mentioned in the singular. Paul uses the plural “covenants” here, which could refer either to the three affirmations of the Mosaic covenant (Exod 19; Deut 29–31; Josh 8) or to the multiple covenants made with Noah, Abraham, Israel, and David. The second option is most likely in light of Paul’s reference in Eph 2:12 to the “covenants of promise,” which refers to the various covenants God made with Israel.

giving of the law Alluding to Israel’s experience at Mount Sinai (see Exod 19–24); likely also intended to indicate Israel’s role in the preservation and transmission of Scripture.

the temple service The term latreia denotes religious service or worship, most likely sacrifice (see Rom 12:1; Heb 9:1–6). Paul may be alluding to Israel’s responsibility for the temple’s sacrificial system (see Exod 12:25–26).

the promises Either refers to the promises that God made to Abraham and the patriarchs (Gen 15:9–21; 17:1–22; 26:3–4; 28:13–15; compare Rom 15:8; Gal 3:16) or to the ot promises of redemption and restoration associated with the Messiah (e.g., Isa 4:2; 9:2–8; 11:1–10; see note on Isa 49:8–26).

9:5 patriarchs Refers to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The tribes of Israel are descended from the 12 sons of Jacob. One of those sons, Judah, is an ancestor of Christ.

9:6 word of God Refers to the promises God made to the patriarchs and Israel (see Rom 4:13–21). Paul addresses the implication that God’s plan as revealed through Scripture had failed because ethnic Israel responded negatively to the fulfillment of His promises through Christ.

not all those who are descended from Israel are truly Israel Many Jews appealed to their descent from Abraham as a symbol of their ongoing special relationship with God (compare Matt 3:9; John 8:39). Paul asserts that true membership in God’s chosen people is based on faith, not physical ancestry.

9:7 descendants of Abraham Paul points out that God’s choice of Israel followed the line of one chosen son, Isaac, instead of applying generally to all of Abraham’s descendants. To underscore the point, he quotes Gen 21:12.

In Isaac The son of promise born to Abraham through his wife, Sarah (Gen 21:1–7). God fulfilled His promise to Abraham through Isaac (Gen 12:2; 15:4–6) even though Abraham had other sons (compare Gen 16; 25).

9:8 children of the promise Emphasizes that being included among the children of God depends on God’s faithfulness to His promise, not a person’s physical descent from Abraham.

9:10–13 Here, Paul continues to oppose the implication from Rom 9:6 that God had failed in His promises to Israel. Paul’s primary defense comes from differentiating between an Israel based on ethnicity and an Israel based on God’s choice. Being a member of ethnic Israel does not qualify a person for the promised blessing or the inheritance associated with the promise (vv. 7–9). Paul draws on the events of Gen 25:21–26 as evidence that natural descent—even descent from Isaac, Abraham’s child of promise—does not guarantee God’s favor or choice. Both Jacob and Esau were natural descendants of Abraham through Isaac, but only Jacob was chosen by God to bear the promise of nationhood (see Gen 15:4–6). This event from Israel’s national history serves as an explanation for the present situation.

9:10 Isaac our father See note on Rom 9:7.

9:11 they had not yet been born Illustrates that God’s selection of Jacob over Esau was not based on anything Jacob had done.

election The Greek word used here, eklogē, refers to a choice or selection. Paul is referring to God’s choice to have Jacob and his descendants bear the promise he had made to Abraham (Gen 12:1–2; 15:4–6). Paul is emphasizing God’s sovereign right as Creator to act free from any constraints imposed by human actions.

God’s choice occurred before Esau and Jacob were born and before either of them had done anything good or bad. Therefore, God’s choice is based on His grace, not the merit or works (Rom 9:12) of the one he chose. Compare Eph 1:5 and note.

Eklogē WSNTDICT

Election

9:13 Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated Paul cites Mal 1:2–3 to summarize how God selected Jacob over Esau, even though both were sons of Isaac. See note on Rom 9:10–13.

In the context of Malachi, “Esau” refers collectively to the Edomite nation, the descendants of Esau. Yahweh’s statement in Mal 1:2–3 reflects the respective roles of Jacob (i.e. Israel) and Esau (i.e., Edom) within redemptive history. God chose Israel to bear the promise and enjoy other privileges (see Rom 9:4–5). In this sense, He loved Jacob but hated Esau.

Edomites HBD

Esau DBI

9:14–33 Paul now discusses a potential objection to his previous point about Yahweh’s election of Israel (vv. 10–13): He addresses whether God’s seemingly arbitrary choice of Jacob over Esau, and now the Gentiles as His people, makes him unjust. In his explanation, Paul focuses on God’s sovereignty and invokes several ot passages emphasizing Yahweh’s authority over His creation.

First, Paul quotes twice from the book of Exodus (Exod 9:16; 33:19) to emphasize God’s sovereign choice to show mercy or punish people for their actions (see note on Rom 9:15). To underscore God’s right to make that choice, Paul invokes the prophetic image of the potter freely working with his clay, making some vessels for ordinary use and others for special uses (see Isa 29:16; 45:9 and note; 64:8; Jer 18:4–6). Finally, Paul appeals to the ot prophets to demonstrate that while God’s plan included extending salvation to Gentiles (Hos 1:10; 2:23), that plan does not preclude His promises for the restoration of Israel (Isa 1:9; 10:22–23).

9:15 on whomever I have mercy Paul quotes Exod 33:19. In Exodus, both Israel and Pharaoh rebelled against God; consequently, they were subject to God’s judgment.

God would have been right to punish both parties, but He showed mercy to Israel. God was righteous in that He judged Pharaoh for his unbelief, but He was also righteous in that He granted mercy to Israel. This simultaneous display of God’s righteousness in judgment and mercy is also evident in the death and resurrection of Christ. God judges sin (Rom 8:3), showing that the cost of it is God’s innocent Son, yet He also grants mercy to people controlled by it (5:11). In this way, God’s righteousness is revealed.

9:17 I have raised you up This quotation from Exod 9:16 demonstrates God’s sovereignty for His redemptive purposes.

9:18 he hardens Refers to the hardening of Pharaoh’s heart. See Exod 4:21 and note.

9:19 who has resisted his will The objection expressed here highlights the central tension between divine sovereignty and human responsibility. There is tension between mercy and judgment being entirely dependent on God’s will (Rom 9:18) and God holding people responsible for their sins (3:23).

Paul addresses this difficulty in vv. 20–24, although he never attempts to resolve the fundamental tension. Instead, he maintains it, affirming both divine sovereignty (vv. 14–23) and human responsibility (9:30–10:21).

Romans 9:19–21 Romans 9–11 (Boice)

9:20 On the contrary, O man Paul responds to the objection in v. 19 by emphasizing humanity’s subordinate status in relation to God, the Creator.

9:21 potter The background of Paul’s analogy in vv. 20–23 is found in the potter and clay metaphor used by the prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah (e.g., Isa 45:9; 64:8; Jer 18:4–6).

Both ot prophets used the image of the potter’s total control over the shaping, reshaping, and purpose of his clay creations to emphasize Yahweh’s sovereignty over His creation (see Jer 18:4 and note).

Clay DBI

Metaphor DTIB

9:22 vessels of wrath Paul pushes the boundaries of his metaphor to make a rhetorical point. While it is unlikely that a potter would make a pot just to destroy it, the potter still has the right to do so if he wishes.

This verse is highly debated because it raises the theological issue of double predestination—namely, that God has determined beforehand who will be saved as well as who will be condemned. The mere fact that God chooses to save some but not all people suggests some type of double predestination, but the core issue is how the selection of some for salvation and others for condemnation actually happens. The overall context of Rom 9 suggests that Paul is not attempting to explain how God’s choice in election works. Rather, he is speaking hypothetically and emphasizing that God’s sovereignty is not subject to any human considerations for how He should or could act.

9:23 vessels of mercy In the previous verse, Paul explains that God uses some vessels to demonstrate His wrath, depending solely on His sovereign choice. In the same way, God’s choice of vessels of mercy rests only on His decision to show mercy to them.

9:25–26 In these two verses, Paul cites Hos 2:23 to explain how God accepted the Gentiles as His people. Paul returns to the theme developed in Rom 9:6–13: Becoming part of God’s family is based on His calling and election, not on any ethnic relationship.

Romans 9:24–29 NICNT Ro

9:25 who were not my people Refers to the Gentiles.

Paul cites Hos 2:23 here. In the book of Hosea the people of Israel had broken their covenant with God through idolatrous practices; nevertheless, God showed them mercy and promised to restore them as His people. Paul applies this text to the Gentiles (non-Jewish people) because they, like Israel, were separated from God’s promises, but He still showed them mercy and brought them into His people.

9:26 sons of the living God A quotation of Hos 1:10. Compare Rom 8:14.

9:27 the remnant will be saved Paul cites Isa 10:22–23. His point is that those who are Jewish should not rely upon their race; it did not save those in Isaiah’s day, and it will not save them now. Only a remnant of elect Israel would be saved.

9:29 become like Sodom Paul quotes Isa 1:9 in recognition of God’s grace. Israel’s idolatry required judgment, but God did not annihilate them as He did Sodom and Gomorrah (compare Gen 18:16–19:29).

9:30 attained righteousness Paul explains that non-Jewish people attained righteousness even though they did not pursue right standing before God—because righteousness comes by faith, not works or the law.

9:32 stumbled over See note on Rom 9:33.

9:33 Zion Refers to Jerusalem (see note on Isa 1:8). Originally, the name “Zion indicated the hill where the temple was built, symbolizing God’s chosen dwelling place on earth.

a stone that causes people to stumble Paul’s quotation combines Isa 28:16 with Isa 8:14. Drawing on ot imagery, the stone or rock refers to Christ, whom most Jews rejected as the Messiah (Psa 118:22; compare 1 Pet 2:4–8). His death by crucifixion offended Jewish people because, according to Deut 21:23, a person hanged on a tree is under God’s curse (compare Josh 8:29).

The Jewish religious leaders sought to disprove Jesus’ messianic claims based on this interpretation. They reasoned that God would not allow His Messiah to be crucified. Even those who witnessed Jesus’ crucifixion shared this point of view (see Matt 27:42; Luke 23:35), as did some of His own disciples (Luke 24:19–21).

FSB

About Faithlife Study Bible

Faithlife Study Bible (FSB) is your guide to the ancient world of the Old and New Testaments, with study notes and articles that draw from a wide range of academic research. FSB helps you learn how to think about interpretation methods and issues so that you can gain a deeper understanding of the text.

Copyright

Copyright 2012 Logos Bible Software.

Support Info

fsb

Table of Contents