Loading…
Faithlife Study Bible
Restore columns
Exit Fullscreen

24:1–23 Leviticus 24 is a collection of religious laws, with topics ranging from tabernacle procedures (vv. 1–9) to serious crimes like blasphemy (vv. 10–16). The chapter concludes with a clear declaration of the law of commensurate retaliation in vv. 17–23 (known as the principle of an eye for an eye or lex taliones; compare Exod 21:23–25; Deut 19:21).

24:2 Command the Israelites This stipulation is also given in Exod 27:20–21.

24:3 Aaron shall arrange for it outside the curtain of The lamp is to be placed directly outside the curtain that was to close off the holy of holies (or most holy place; Exod 26:31–35).

a lasting statute The Hebrew phrase used here, chuqqath olam, is a common refrain in biblical law used to emphasize the enduring nature of a decree and underscore the importance of continued observance (see note on Lev 16:34).

24:5–9 A similar practice of placing bread before a deity was common in the ancient Near East. The idea was that the gods needed to be served bread and wine for sustenance. The deuterocanonical story of Bel and the Dragon reveals the reality that priests, not the deities themselves, were consuming the food. Daniel proves that the priests had been secretly entering the temple chamber and eating the food left before the statue of Bel. The practice outlined here of leaving the bread (Exod 25:30) before Yahweh belongs to this tradition but departs from it significantly since the bread is explicitly designated as food for the priests, not Yahweh (Lev 24:9).

24:5 twelve ring-shaped bread cakes Refers to the bread of the Presence (see Exod 25:30 and note).

24:6 pure gold table Refers to the table for the bread of the presence in the holy place (compare Exod 25:23–30; 1 Kgs 7:48; 2 Chr 13:11; Heb 9:2).

Table of Showbread

The table held 12 loaves of bread, probably symbolizing the 12 tribes of Israel. The loaves were displayed in two equal rows. They were not touched during the entire week until the Sabbath, when they were replaced with 12 freshly baked loaves. The old loaves were eaten by the priests in a sacred area (Lev 24:9). Because of the way the loaves were displayed in two equal rows, the bread was also referred to as lechem hamma'arekheth (“the bread of rows”; 1 Chr 9:32; 23:29; Neh 10:33). In Numbers it is called lechem hattamid (“the regular bread”; Num 4:7). These descriptive names are combined in 2 Chr 2:4 where the showbread is called ma'arekheth tamid (“regular rows”).

24:7 pure frankincense A fragrant resin used as a perfume and as a spice (see note on Lev 2:1). Levitical worship included a daily incense offering (Exod 30:7–10, 34–35). The tabernacle was to be scented with aromatic spices (Exod 30:24–28). Frankincense was an ingredient in grain offerings (Lev 2:1), so it is unclear whether the frankincense here is poured over the loaves or burned as incense beside them.

Incense AYBD

24:8 On every Sabbath The command to arrange 12 loaves every Sabbath likely means that fresh loaves were brought on the Sabbath and the loaves from the previous week were consumed. Since regular loaves would have been hardened and spoiled after a week, unleavened bread was probably used for this purpose. Josephus explicitly says the loaves were unleavened bread (Ant. 3.142–43).

Sabbath DOT: P

Sabbath ISBE

24:9 they shall eat it in a holy place As seen in 6:16; 8:31; 21:22, certain components of the sacrifices functioned as sustenance for the priesthood.

24:10–23 This passage recounts a narrative about a particular incident that demanded a legal decision by Moses. The anecdote emphasizes the severity of blasphemy, but the overall aim of the passage is to make explicit that the same law applies to all—whether an offense is committed by a native Israelite or by a foreigner living among them (e.g., a sojourner or resident alien).

The blasphemer in the story had an Egyptian father. Since he was initially detained pending clarification of what was to be done (v. 12), his ethnic status must have caused confusion over whether the law applied. Moses clarifies that the punishment for blasphemy was death and that it was not restricted by ethnic considerations (v. 16). A brief list of transgressions and their penalties appears in vv. 17–21. The list concludes with the statement that the same laws applied to all in the community whether they are part of the community by birth or by choice (v. 22). The report of the entire incident concludes with the death of the perpetrator (v. 23).

Blasphemy LTW

24:10 an Israelite woman’s son, and he was an Egyptian man’s The man guilty of blasphemy is only half Israelite, so his status in the community was ambiguous. He was part native Israelite (ezrach) and part resident alien (ger). The legal decision in v. 16 makes clear the law is the same for both groups.

24:11 blasphemed The crime of blasphemy is characterized by slander and contempt toward the sacred. Here the name of God was used in a cursing fashion, reflecting extreme disrespect for Yahweh. Blasphemy was specifically prohibited in Exod 22:28. The penalty was death.

Blasphemy LTW

the name In ot theology, the “name” (shem) of God was a way to refer to the person of God himself (e.g., Psa 75:1; Prov 18:10; Isa 24:15; 30:27). God takes personal offense at any affiliation or association with Him that denigrates His character or reputation. The Hebrew term for “The Name” (ha-shem) is still used as a substitution for God’s personal name (Yahweh; compare Exod 3:14) and, in effect, God himself.

The Name DDD

The Name Theology of the Old Testament

the tribe of Dan The reference to Dan may have been a later addition, serving to cast that tribe in a bad light. Dan later became home to the illegitimate (and blasphemous) religious center started by Jeroboam after the kingdom divided following the death of Solomon (see 1 Kgs 12:25; 13:33–34).

24:12 in custody Incarceration was rare in Israel. Penalties for crimes were either capital or required restitution, not imprisonment.

24:14 Bring the curser outside the camp Capital punishment was undertaken outside Israel’s normal living space—in part due to the uncleanness of corpses.

However, moving the execution scene outside the camp had symbolic impact: It indicated that taking a human life—even if ordered by the law—was a terrible act that should not be associated with sanctified ground.

24:16 alien A resident alien (ger) was subject to the same penalty for blasphemy as a natural-born member of the community (ezrach). This decision is applied to blasphemy specifically, but Lev 24:22 makes clear that the principle applies broadly with the same law for all.

24:17–22 This segment interrupts the narrative with an explanation of the legal principle of appropriate retaliation (often called lex talionis; see note on vv. 1–23). This principle insures that the punishment is commensurate with the crime (“eye for an eye”; see Gen 9:6; Exod 21:23–25; Deut 19:21). The only appropriate restitution for blasphemy is death.

Lex Talionis NIDBV15

Lex Talionis ZEB H—L

24:21 shall be put to death Human life and animal life are differentiated in ot law. There was no death penalty for killing an animal, even intentionally; rather, restitution was the punishment.

24:22 one norm Everyone is under the same law and subject to the same penalty. The law makes no distinction for ethnic origin.

24:23 they stoned him with stones The account of the blasphemer ends with his death at the hands of the community.

FSB

About Faithlife Study Bible

Faithlife Study Bible (FSB) is your guide to the ancient world of the Old and New Testaments, with study notes and articles that draw from a wide range of academic research. FSB helps you learn how to think about interpretation methods and issues so that you can gain a deeper understanding of the text.

Copyright

Copyright 2012 Logos Bible Software.

Support Info

fsb

Table of Contents