Loading…
Faithlife Study Bible
Restore columns
Exit Fullscreen

39:1–23 The narrative transitions from the Judah and Tamar episode (ch. 38) back into the account of Joseph. The opening verse repeats information from where the Joseph story left off (compare 37:36; 39:1). This chapter describes how Yahweh protects and blesses Joseph in Potiphar’s house and in prison (see note on v. 2), and it hints at Joseph’s future in Pharaoh’s court.

39:1 Potiphar See note on 37:36.

39:2 Yahweh was with Joseph This phrase occurs four times in this chapter (vv. 2, 3, 21, 23). The repetition reinforces the providential storyline.

he was in the house of Joseph was not made to labor in the fields, which suggests that Potiphar discerned abilities that made him more suitable for household management.

39:3 his master observed that Yahweh was with him Although Potiphar likely doesn’t know about Yahweh, Joseph’s God, he perceives that Joseph is divinely enabled.

39:4 he appointed him over his house The Hebrew phrase used here, al betho—which may be literally rendered “over his house”—and the remainder of the verse indicates that Joseph oversaw everything owned by Potiphar.

Slaves in Egypt commonly held occupations of high responsibility within households. For example, the Egyptian document Papyrus Brooklyn (circa 1800 bc) lists nearly 80 male and female slaves in an Egyptian household by name with their occupations. Many are described as Asiatic, which is an Egyptian term that included Semites like Joseph. However this does not mean that foreigners from Canaan were viewed positively by Egyptians (see note on 46:34; compare 43:32). Papyrus Brooklyn’s list also includes several persons whose job is titled hry-pr (“he who is over the house”). The title refers to a domestic servant.

39:6 well built and handsome This detail sometimes signals trouble in ot narratives; many biblical characters noted for their beauty undergo severe hardship or failure (see 1 Sam 9:2; 2 Sam 14:25). Here it may hint at the problems that will arise in connection with Joseph’s attractiveness.

39:7 Lie with me In addition to the issue of adultery, having sexual relations with the wife or concubine of one’s superior was viewed as a usurpation of power (see note on 2 Sam 3:7). Sex with Potiphar’s wife would constitute an attempt to gain control over his master’s property and would likely have led to Joseph’s execution.

39:8 he refused Joseph’s refusal is immediate and direct. He does not react angrily, knowing his place, but he allows for no flirtatious conversation.

39:10 to be with her This detail probably indicates that Joseph not only refuses to have sex with Potiphar’s wife, but also refuses even to be in her presence.

39:12 she seized him by his garment His outer garment or cloak, similar to the one his father gave him (see Gen 37:3 and note).

The stage is set for Joseph’s downfall. The garment suggests that he is in the house and in the presence of his master’s wife. Since it is customary to remove the outer garment upon entering a house, Joseph probably thinks that his master’s wife’s intentions will go unnoticed. But now she has evidence to exact revenge on the slave who has embarrassed her (see v. 14 and note). This is the second time that Joseph loses a position of prominence because of an article of clothing (see 37:33).

39:14 she called to the men of The actions of Potiphar’s wife may reflect dread. If Potiphar discovered the truth, she could be severely punished and divorced. However, since the narrator notes that none of the servants were in the house at the time of the attempted seduction (v. 11), her actions do not seem to be motivated by self-defense—rather, they were spiteful.

Potiphar’s wife reacts out of bitterness at being spurned. She knew the house was empty and could thus tell her husband she had screamed (v. 15) without being contradicted. The detail about Joseph fleeing the house was also useful in case anyone saw Joseph leaving.

39:16 his master This phrase reveals the loyalties of both the accused and the accuser. Joseph has had Potiphar’s best interests in mind for roughly 11 years (see note on 40:1), but Potiphar’s wife views her husband as no more than the master of slaves like Joseph.

39:17 The Hebrew slave The Egyptians were suspicious of foreigners, so Potiphar’s wife highlights Joseph’s ethnicity as well as his status.

39:19 he became very angry The text does not state the object of Potiphar’s anger, perhaps suggesting that Potiphar may have been suspicious of his wife.

Potiphar’s anger is fueled either by the accusations against Joseph—if he does not believe his wife—or by the loss of his best slave and overseer. He is in a difficult position. If he believes his wife, then Joseph must be imprisoned, and the household will suffer. If he doesn’t believe her, he cannot shame his household by elevating the testimony of a foreign slave over his wife’s reputation—he still has to punish Joseph.

39:20 prison Joseph’s punishment is distinctly Egyptian; incarceration is attested to in Egyptian documents, but does not appear in other ancient Near Eastern law codes.

39:21 loyal love The Hebrew word used here, chesed, often refers to general kindness (20:13; 21:23). When used in contexts of providential favor regarding Israel and the descendants of Abraham, it indicates a love that is due to loyalty to the divine covenant promises.

Grace DOT: P

Loving-kindness Vine’s

Chasad NIDOTTE

Chesed Word Study

FSB

About Faithlife Study Bible

Faithlife Study Bible (FSB) is your guide to the ancient world of the Old and New Testaments, with study notes and articles that draw from a wide range of academic research. FSB helps you learn how to think about interpretation methods and issues so that you can gain a deeper understanding of the text.

Copyright

Copyright 2012 Logos Bible Software.

Support Info

fsb

Table of Contents