Ecclesiastes 8:1–9

Footnotes

1. 1 The preposition ךְּ (kaf) prefixed to כְּהֶחָכָם (kéhekhakham, “wise man”) is traditionally taken in a comparative sense: “Who is like [or as] the wise man?” On the other hand, it may denote identity, e.g., Gen 1:26; Num 11:1; 1 Sam 20:3; 2 Sam 9:8; Neh 7:2; Job 10:9; Nah 3:6 (see R. J. Williams, Hebrew Syntax, 47, §261; §11.2.9b).
2. 2 The definite article on הֶחָכָם (hekhakham, “wise man”) may be taken in an individualizing (“the wise man”) or generic sense (“a wise man”).
3. 3 Or “the explanation.” The noun פֵּשֶׁר (pesher) denotes “solution; explanation; interpretation; meaning” ( פֵּשֶׁר; 833 פֵּשֶׁר). The Hebrew term is an Aramaic loanword from פִּשְׁרָא (pishra’, “diagnosis; meaning; solution”). The Aramaic noun פְּשַׁר (péshar, “interpretation of a dream or prophecy”) and verb פְּשַׁר (péshar, “to interpret a dream or prophecy”) reflect a later meaning not present in Ecclesiastes, but current at the time of Daniel (Dan 2:5–7; 4:3, 15, 16; 5:12, 15, 16; 7:16) and Qumran (e.g., 1QpHab).
4. 4 Heb “a thing.”
5. 5 Heb “makes his face shine.”
6. 6 The vocalizes the consonantal form ישנא as יְשֻׁנֶּא (yéshunne’, Pual imperfect 3rd person masculine singular from I שָׁנָה, shana, “to change”). However, the μισθήσεται (misthēsetai) reflects an alternate vocalization tradition of יִשָּׂנֵא (yissane’, Niphal imperfect 3rd person masculine singular from שָׂנֵא, sane’, “to hate”), while the ’s commutabit reflects יְשַׁנֶּה (yéshanneh, Piel imperfect 3rd person masculine singular from II שָׁנָה, shanah, “to repeat”). Heb “the strength of his face is changed.”
7. 7 Heb “the strength of his face is changed.” The expression עֹז פָּנָיו (’oz panayv, “strength of his face”) is an idiom for “boldness; impudence” ( 739 עֹז 4) or “hard face” = harsh countenance ( I עֹז 1.c).
8. 8 The Leningrad Codex (the basis of ) reads אֲנִי (’ani, 1st person common singular independent personal pronoun): “I obey the king’s command.” Other medieval Hebrew and all the versions (, , , ) preserve an alternate textual tradition of the definite accusative marker אֶת־ (’et) introducing the direct object: אֶת־פִּי־מֶלֶךְ שְׁמוֹר (’et-pi-melekh shémor, “Obey the command of the king”). External evidence supports the alternate textual tradition. The is guilty of simple orthographic confusion between similar looking letters. The editors and the Hebrew Old Testament Text Project adopt אֶת־ as the original reading. See D. Barthélemy, e.d., Preliminary and Interim Report on the Hebrew Old Testament Text Project, 3:582–83.
9. 9 The phrase “you took” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for smoothness.
10. 10 The genitive-construct שְׁבוּעַת אֱלֹהִים (shévu’at ’elohim, “an oath of God”) functions as a genitive of location (“an oath before God”) or an adjectival genitive of attribute (“a supreme oath”).
11. 11 The words “to be loyal to him” do not appear in the Hebrew text, but are supplied in the translation for clarification.
12. 12 Or “do not stand up for a bad cause.”
13. 13 Heb “word.”
14. 14 Heb “supreme.”
15. 15 Heb “Who can say …?”
16. 16 The word “his” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for smoothness and clarity.
17. 17 Heb “the heart of a wise man.”
18. 18 The term עֵת (’et, “time”) connotes “a proper, suitable time for an event; the right moment” ( עֵת 6; 773 עֵת 2.b); e.g., “it was the time for rain” (Ezra 10:13); “a time of judgment for the nations” (Ezek 30:3); “there is an appropriate time for every occasion” (Eccl 3:1); “the time when mountain goats are born” (Job 39:1); “the rain in its season” (Deut 11:14; Jer 5:24); “the time for the harvest” (Hos 2:11; Ps 1:3); “food in its season” (Ps 104:27).
19. 19 Heb “evil”; or “misery.”
20. 20 Heb “the man.”
21. 21 Heb “upon him.”
22. 22 Heb “what will be.”
23. 23 Heb “Who can tell him what will be?”
24. 24 Heb “There is not a man who has mastery over the wind to restrain the wind.”
25. 25 The word “his” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.
26. 26 Heb “There is no discharge in war.”
27. 27 Heb “its owners.”
28. 28 The term נָתוֹן (naton, Qal infinitive absolute from נָתַן, natan, “to give”) is a verbal use of the infinitive absolute, used with vav to indicate an action that took place simultaneous to the main verb (see §35.5.2d). Thus, the clause וְנָתוֹן אֶת־לִבִּי (vénaton ’et-libbi, “while applying my mind …”) indicates contemporaneous action to the clause, “All this I have seen” (אֶת־כָּל־זֶה רָאִיתִי, ’et-kol-zeh ra’iti). This is view is taken by several translations: “All this I have seen, having applied my mind to” (); “All this I observed while applying my mind to” (); “All this I saw, as I applied my mind to” (); “All this I saw, as thoughtfully I pondered” (). On the other hand, the vav is taken in a coordinating sense (“and”) and the infinitive absolute as an independent verb: Και συμπαν τουτο εἰδον, και ἐδωκα την καρδιαν μου εἰς (“I saw all this, and I applied my heart to”). This reading is adopted by other English versions: “All this I have seen, and applied my heart” (); “All these things I considered and I applied my mind” (); “All this have I seen, and applied my heart unto” (); “All this I have seen and applied my mind to” (); “All these things I observed; I noted” ().
29. 29 Heb “my heart.”
30. 30 Heb “every work”; or “every deed.”
31. 31 Heb “that is done under the sun.” The phrase “that is done under the sun” (אֲשֶׁר נַעֲשָׂה תַּחַת הַשָּׁמֶשׁ, ’asher na’asah takhat hashamesh) is an idiom for “what happens in this world” or “on the earth” ( 1039 שֶׁמֶשׁ 4.c). renders this idiom, “what goes on within this world.”
32. 32 Heb “the man.” The article on הָאָדָם (ha’adam, “the man”) can be taken in a particularizing sense (“one person”) or in a collective sense as humankind as a whole (“humankind”); see I אָדָם 1; 9 אָדָם 2. So : “All the things in which man has power over [his fellow] man to afflict him.” This is adopted by the (“man lords it over man to his hurt”); (“men still had authority over men to treat them unjustly”); (“men have power over their fellows, power to injure them”); (“man has mastery over another to harm him”); and (“man hath ruled over man to his own evil”). On the other hand, 8:1–9 focuses on the absolute power of the king, so the referent of הָאָדָם is probably the king. The article functions in an individualizing, particularizing sense. The particularization of הָאָדָם is reflected in many English versions: “one man” (, , , , ), “a man” (, ), and “one person” ().
33. 33 The verb שָׁלַט (shalat) denotes “to domineer; to dominate; to lord it over” ( שׁלט; 1020 שָׁלַט). The English versions have: “rule over” (, , ), “have power over” (, ), “lord it over” (, ), “have authority over” (), “exercise authority over” (, ); “have mastery over” (); “tyrannize” ().
34. 34 Heb “man.” The word “other” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity. The singular noun אָדָם (’adam, “man”) functions as a collective singular, connoting “men, people” (cf. אָדָם 1; 9 אָדָם 2). The absence of the article might suggest an indefinite rather than an individual, particular sense.
35. 35 Heb “a man exercises power over [another] man to his harm” [or “to his own harm”]. The 3rd person masculine singular singular pronominal suffix לוֹ (lo, “to his”) may refer to the antecedent אָדָם (’adam, “man” or “men”), being understood either in a singular sense (so , , , , , ) or in a collective sense (, , margin). However, the antecedent might be הָאָדם (ha’adam, “[one] man” = the king) with the suffix functioning reflexively: “to his own harm” (, margin, , , ).