E. P. Sanders, Paul, 1–12 and pt 1 (though Limbeck’s earlier critique of the negative depiction of the law in OT and “intertestamental” scholarship should also be mentioned; see also particularly Gaston, “Torah,” 48–54, and Watson, Paul, 2–18; for examples of discussion in terms of older categories see Kuss, “Nomos,” with review of earlier literature; Lang; and Hübner). Sanders has been successful in getting across a point which others had made before him (e.g., Stendahl, “Introspective Conscience,”
Page lxv