Loading…

Word Biblical Commentary, Volume 34A: Mark 1–8:26 is unavailable, but you can change that!

Thoroughly engaging with the massive body of scholarship on Mark, Robert Guelich’s commentary presents a thorough textual, historical, and theological examination of Mark. He addresses “the synoptic problem” and provides an engaging and stimulating exposition on the church’s second gospel.

which purportedly came from the Elder. Furthermore, 1 Pet 5:13, regardless of the date of 1 Peter, can hardly support this distinction, since the mention of both Silvanus and Mark in 1 Pet 5:12–13 makes clear that “Mark” was the John Mark of Acts and the Pauline corpus who along with Silvanus (Silas) had also been a companion of Paul. Therefore, the traditional identification of Mark as being the John Mark of the NT seems to stand. Ultimately, however, the question of authorship is moot for our reading
Page xxix