He also calls it historical-grammatical interpretation. He says that’s basically the same idea. He also uses the phrase “normal interpretation.” He also uses the term “plain interpretation.” I think any fair reader—if you realize he’s used four different ways to describe the same thing—would recognize there must be some sort of fuzziness he’s trying to clarify here. There must be some reason he has used multiple ways to explain it, and I think it’s because some of these terms are not always used