Loading…

Text in a Whirlwind: A Critique of Four Exegetical Devices at 1 Timothy 2:9–15 is unavailable, but you can change that!

Holmes examines four exegetical devices employed by countering sides in the debate regarding 1 Timothy 2:9–15. She proposes that together these differing positions actually create a ‘whirlwind’ which obscures the text’s meaning. Her investigation considers whether (1) the immediate context is general, not ecclesial; (2) the background reconstructed from passages elsewhere in the Pastoral letters...

or Aorist, the lower-case ‘present’, or ‘future’, being reserved for time. (b) The morphological forms provide some indication of a structure in which the writer/speaker’s emphases may be identified. McKay wisely urges that in all cases the context must be considered with the greatest care if the most accurate temporal and aspectual translation of that structure is to be achieved.42 As does Porter, however, he provides some guidelines. The Present highlights transition to a new unit and factors therein
Page 32