does not turn his back on the seminary, is made over into a warped and fragmented man. The very gap—and often tension—which exists between the faculty members of the two branches of the seminary is evidence of the failure of the seminary, and of its neoplatonism. The “practical” men are normally taken from the pastorate; they are good at public relations, promotions, financing, pulpiteering, and the like, and sometimes fuzzy on doctrine. The scholars on the faculty are at best judiciously tolerant