Loading…

Romans: A Structural, Thematic, & Exegetical Commentary is unavailable, but you can change that!

Encounter Romans on its own terms. Paul’s majestic letter to the Romans has impacted generations of readers. Christians regularly turn to it as a foundation for theology and practice. All too often, however, individual verses are pulled from their context or later doctrinal formulations are mapped onto the text. Are we truly understanding Paul? What if we return to Romans on its own terms? ...

unanimous that “love” and “hate” in this context refer to covenantal loyalty and covenantal disavowal, respectively (i.e., neither soteriology nor even “election,” generally, are at all in view). Scholars are also unanimous that “Jacob” and “Esau” in vv. 2b–3a are poetic references (by way of eponymous ancestors) to the two “brother” nations of Israel and Edom (i.e., that the oracle and Gen 25 are irrelevant to each other). God’s claim in Mal 1:2–5, then, is that in accordance with the vivid example
Page 504