(2 Kgs 23:4–14) reflect interests and particulars that cannot simply be derived from Deuteronomy. These include the fate of non-Yahwistic priests (v. 5), particular cultic installations in Jerusalem (vv. 6–7, 8b, 10–13), and the technical details of desecration (vv. 6b, 14). The presence of these non-Deuteronomic interests suggests that DH used a source at this point and that the cultic reform of Josiah actually did take place. Even apart from the question of Josiah’s reform, Deuteronomy reflects