Loading…

Identity and Idolatry: The Image of God and Its Inversion is unavailable, but you can change that!

Genesis 1:26-27 has served as the locus of most theological anthropologies in the central Christian tradition. However, Richard Lints observes that too rarely have these verses been understood as conceptually interwoven with the whole of the prologue materials of Genesis 1. The construction of the cosmic temple strongly hints that the “image of God” language serves liturgical functions. Lints...

The issues of the canon are predominantly questions of human identity rather than of human nature. There are restraints in the canon for any full-blown theory of human nature, but the description of human capacities in metaphysically and scientifically appropriate ways is not the animating concern of Scripture. The Scriptures are permeated throughout by the questions of meaning. Too often theological treatments of the imago Dei have oriented themselves towards accounts of human nature and less towards
Page 35