Recursos seleccionados para estudios posteriores

Archer, Gleason, G. A Survey of Old Testament Introduction. Moody Press: Chicago, 1975.

Astruc, Jean. Conjectures sur les mémoires originaux dont il paroit que Moyse s’est servi, pour composer le Livre de la Genese. Bruselas: Fricx, 1753.

Barrett, C.K. “Q: A Re-examination”. Expository Times (1942–43): 320–23.

Bussmann, W. “Synoptische Studien”. Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche (1930): 147ff.

Carlson, Steve C. The Two Source Hypothesis. 27 de septiembre de 2002. http: //www.mindspring.com~scarlsonsynopt2shindex.htm (consultado el 13 de febrero de 2010).

Catchpole, David R. The Quest for Q. Edimburgo: T&T Clark, 1993.

———. “Source, Form and Redaction Criticism of the New Testament”. Páginas 166–67 en A Handbook of the Exegesis of the New Testament. Editado por Stanley E. Porter. Leiden: Brill, 2002.

Closson, Don. “Did Moses Write the Pentateuch?” Plano, Texas: Probe Ministries, 2001.

Abrigos, G.W. Genesis with an Introduction to Narrative Literature. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1983.

Derickson, G.W. “Matthean Priority~Authorship and Evangelicalism’s Boundary”. The Master’s Seminary Journal 14 (2003): 87–103.

Farmer, William R. “Luke’s Use of Matthew: A Christological Inquiry.” Perkins (School of Theology) Journal (1984): 39–50.

Farrer, Austin M. “On Dispensing with Q”. En New Testament Essays: Studies in Memory of R.H. Lightfoot de Dennis E. Nineham. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (1955): 55–88.

Geisler, Norman L. Biblical Errancy: An Analysis of Its Philosophical Roots. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981.

Goodacre, Mark. The Case against Q: Studies in Markan Priority and the Synoptic Problem. Harrisburg: Trinity Press, 2002.

Goulder, M.D. Luke: A New Paradigm. Diario para el estudio del Nuevo Testamento: Suplemento de la serie 20. Sheffield:JSOT Prensa, 1989.

———. “The Order of a Crank”. Páginas 111–30 en Synoptic Studies: The Ampleforth Conferences of 1982 and 1983. Editado por C.M. Tuckett, Sheffield:JSOT Press, 1984.

———. Midrash and Lection in Matthew. Londres: SPCK, 1974.

Greisbach, J.J. “A Demonstration that Mark Was Written after Matthew and Luke”. Páginas 108–10 en J.J. Griesbach: Synoptic and Text-Critical Studies 1776–1996. Editado por Bernard Orchard y Thomas R.W. Langstaff. Traducido por Bernard Orchard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Gunkel, Hermann. Eucharistérion: Studien zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments. Gotinga: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1923.

Hawkins, J.C. “Horae Synopticae”. Serie Oxford (1909): 64 y siguientes.

Holtzmann, Heinrich J. Die Synoptischen Evangelien: Ihr Ursprung und ihr geschichtlicher Charakter. Leipzig, 1863.

Jameson, Hampden G. The Origin of the Synoptic Gospels: A Revision of the Synoptic Problem. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1922.

Kaiser, Walter C., Jr. Exodus. Comentario bíblico del expositor. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1990.

Kloppenborg, John S. The Formation of Q: Trajectories in Ancient Wisdom Collections. Filadelfia: Fortress Press, 1987.

———. “Introduction.” Páginas 1 a 21 en John S. Kloppenborg, The Shape of Q: Signal Essays on the Sayings Gospel. Minneapolis: Augsburgo, 1994.

———. “Source Criticism”. Páginas 340–44 en Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation. Editado por Stanley E. Porter. Nueva York: Routledge, 2007.

Lummis, E.W. How Luke was Written (Considerations Affecting the Two-Document Hypothesis Theory with Special Reference to the Phenomena of Order in the Non-Marcan Matter Common to Matthew and Luke). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1915.

McKnight, escocés. “Source Criticism”. Páginas 74–105 en Interpreting the New Testament: Essays on Methods and Issues. Editado por David Alan Black y David S. Dockery. Nashville: Broadman y Holman, 2001.

Montgomery, John W. “The Fuzzification of Biblical Inerrancy.” Faith Founded on Fact: Essays in Evidential Apologetics. Nashville, Tennessee: Nelson, 1978.

Neville, David J. Arguments from Order in the Synoptic Source Criticism: A History and Critique. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1993.

———. Mark’s Gospel—Prior or Posterior: A Reappraisal of the Phenomenon of Order. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002.

Nickle, Keith F. The Synoptic Gospels: An Introduction. Londres: Westminster John Knox, 2001.

Olsen, Ken. “Unpicking on the Farrer Theory”. Páginas 127–50 en Questioning Q: A Multidimensional Critique. Editado por Mark Goodacre y Nicholas Perrin. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 2004.

Orchard, Bernard y Thomas R.W. Longstaff. J.J. Griesbach: Synoptic and Text-Critical Studies 1776–1976. Serie 34 de monografías de la Sociedad de Estudios del Nuevo Testamento. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Parker, Pierson. The Gospel before Mark. Chicago: Universidad de Chicago, 1953.

Patton, C.S. Sources of the Synoptic Gospels. Nueva York: Macmillan Co., 1915.

Sanday, William. Studies in the Synoptic Problem. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911.

———. “The Conditions Under which the Gospels Were Written, in Their Bearing upon Some Difficulties of the Synoptic Problem”. Páginas 3 a 26 de Studies in the Synoptic Problem. Editado por William Sanday. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911.

Sanders, E.P. y M. Davies. Studying the Synoptic Gospels. Filadelfia: Trinity Press, 1989.

Sanders, E.P. “The Argument from Order and the Relationship between Matthew and Luke”. New Testament Studies (1969): 249–61.

Segal, M.H. Pentateuch: Its Composition and Its Authorship. Jerusalén: Magnes Press, 1967.

Streeter, B. H. “On the Order of Q”. Páginas 141–64 en Oxford Studies in the Synoptic Problem. Editado por William Sanday. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911.

———. “The Original Extent of Q”. Páginas 184–208 en Studies in the Synoptic Problem. Editado por William Sanday. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911.

———. The Four Gospels a Study of Origins. Londres: MacMillan and Co., 1924.

Tan, R.K. “Recent Developments in Redaction Criticism: From Investigation into of Textual Prehistory Back to Historical-Grammatical Exegesis”. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 44 (2001): 599–614.

Taylor, Vincent. “The Order of Q”. Journal of Theological Studies (1953): 27–31.v

Thompson, T.L. The Origin Tradition of Ancient Israel. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1987.

Tuckett, C.M. Q and the History of Early Christianity. Edimburgo: T&T Clark, 1996.

Unger, Merrill F. Introductory Guide to the Old Testament, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1950.

Van Seters, John. Abraham in History and Tradition New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.

———. Prologue to History: The Yahwist as Historian in Genesis. Louisville, KY.: Westminster John Knox, 1992.

Weiss, B. Die Quellen des Lukasevangeliums. Stuttgart y Berlín: Cotta, 1907.

Weisse, Christian Hermann. Die evangelische Geschichte, kritisch und philosophisch bearbeitet. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Hartel, 1838

Wellhausen, J. Prolegomena of the History of Israel. Edimburgo: T&T Clark, 1885.

Wenham, David. “Source Criticism”. Páginas 139–52 en New Testament Interpretation: Essays on Principles and Methods. Editado por I. Howard Marshall. Carlisle: Paternoster Press, 1977.

Wilke, Christian G. Der Urevangelist oder exegetisch kritische Untersuchung über das Verwandtschaftsverhältniß der drei ersten Evangelien. Dresde y Leipzig: Fleischer, 1838.

Guiño, Walter. The Bible in Human Transformation. Filadelfia: Fortress Press, 1973.

Thomas E. Barker