The Future of Bible Study Is Here.

You have not started any reading plans.
- More »
Sign in or register for a free account to set your preferred Bible and rate books.
1 aIn the beginning was bthe Word, and cthe Word was with God, and dthe Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 eAll things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 fIn him was life,1 and gthe life was the light of men. 5 hThe light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
6 There was a man isent from God, whose name was jJohn. 7He came as a kwitness, to bear witness about the light, lthat all might believe through him. 8 mHe was not the light, but came to bear witness about the light.
9 nThe true light, which gives light to everyone, was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and the world was made through him, yet othe world did not know him. 11 He came to phis own,2 and qhis own people3 rdid not receive him. 12 But to all who did receive him, swho believed in his name, the gave the right uto become vchildren of God, 13 who wwere born, xnot of blood ynor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.
14 And zthe Word abecame flesh and bdwelt among us, cand we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son4 from the Father, full of dgrace and etruth. 15 (fJohn bore witness about him, and cried out, “This was he of whom I said, g‘He who comes after me ranks before me, because he was before me.’ ”) 16 For from hhis fullness we have all received, igrace upon grace.5 17 For jthe law was given through Moses; kgrace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 lNo one has ever seen God; mthe only God,6 who is at the Father’s side,7 nhe has made him known.
The Testimony of John the Baptist
19 And this is the otestimony of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, p“Who are you?” 20 qHe confessed, and did not deny, but confessed, “I am not the Christ.” 21 And they asked him, “What then? rAre you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you sthe Prophet?” And he answered, “No.” 22 So they said to him, “Who are you? We need to give an answer to those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?” 23 He said, “I am tthe voice of one crying out in the wilderness, ‘Make straight8 the way of the Lord,’ as the prophet Isaiah said.”
24 (Now they had been sent from the Pharisees.) 25 They asked him, u“Then why are you baptizing, if you are neither the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?” 26 John answered them, v“I baptize with water, but among you stands one you do not know, 27 even whe who comes after me, the strap of whose sandal I am not worthy to untie.” 28 These things took place in Bethany across the Jordan, where John was baptizing.
29 The next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, xthe Lamb of God, who ytakes away the sin zof the world! 30 This is he of whom I said, a‘After me comes a man who ranks before me, because he was before me.’ 31 I myself did not know him, but bfor this purpose I came baptizing with water, that he might be revealed to Israel.” 32 And John cbore witness: d“I saw the Spirit descend from heaven like a dove, and eit remained on him. 33 I myself did not know him, but fhe who sent me to baptize gwith water said to me, ‘He on whom you see the Spirit descend and remain, hthis is he who baptizes gwith the Holy Spirit.’ 34 And I have seen and have borne witness that this is the Son9 of God.”
Jesus Calls the First Disciples
35 The next day again John was standing with two of his disciples, 36 and he looked at Jesus as he walked by and said, “Behold, ithe Lamb of God!” 37 The two disciples heard him say this, and they followed Jesus. 38 Jesus turned and saw them following and said to them, j“What are you seeking?” And they said to him, k“Rabbi” (which means Teacher), “where are you staying?” 39 He said to them, “Come and you will see.” So they came and saw where he was staying, and they stayed with him that day, for it was about the tenth hour.10 40 lOne of the two who heard John speak and followed Jesus11 was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother. 41 He first found his own brother Simon and said to him, “We have found mthe Messiah” (which means Christ). 42 He brought him to Jesus. Jesus looked at him and said, “You are Simon the son of nJohn. You shall be called oCephas” (which means pPeter12).
Jesus Calls Philip and Nathanael
43 qThe next day Jesus decided rto go to Galilee. He found Philip and said to him, “Follow me.” 44 Now sPhilip was from Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. 45 Philip found tNathanael and said to him, “We have found him of whom uMoses in the Law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus vof Nazareth, wthe son of Joseph.” 46 Nathanael said to him, x“Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” Philip said to him, “Come and see.” 47 Jesus saw Nathanael coming toward him and said of him, “Behold, yan Israelite indeed, zin whom there is no deceit!” 48 Nathanael said to him, “How ado you know me?” Jesus answered him, “Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you.” 49 Nathanael answered him, b“Rabbi, cyou are the Son of God! You are the dKing of Israel!” 50 Jesus answered him, “Because I said to you, ‘I saw you under the fig tree,’ do you believe? You will see greater things than these.” 51 And he said to him, “Truly, truly, I say to you,13 you will see eheaven opened, and fthe angels of God ascending and descending on gthe Son of Man.”

![]() |
About English Standard VersionThe English Standard Version™ is founded on the conviction that the words of the Bible are the very words of God. And because the words themselves—not just the thoughts or ideas—are inspired by God, each word must be translated with the greatest precision and accuracy. As Jesus Himself stressed, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God” (Matt. 4:4). This passion for God’s Word is the driving force behind the translation of the ESV™ Bible. The English Standard Version™ does not try to “improve” on the original in light of today’s culture or by using trendy language. Instead, the utmost care has been taken to express God’s Word in English that most closely captures the meaning of the original, with understandability, beauty, and impact. |
Copyright |
The Classic Reference Edition, English Standard Version® (ESV®)
The Holy Bible, English Standard Version ESV Text Edition (2016) The ESV text may be quoted (in written, visual, or electronic form) up to and inclusive of five hundred (500) verses without express written permission of the publisher, providing that the verses quoted do not amount to a complete book of the Bible nor do the verses quoted account for twenty-five (25%) percent or more of the total text of the work in which they are quoted. The ESV text may be quoted for audio use (audio cassettes, CD’s, audio television) up to five hundred (500) verses without express written permission of the publisher providing that the verses quoted do not amount to a complete book of the Bible nor do the verses quoted account for twenty-five (25%) percent or more the total text of the work in which they are quoted. Notice of copyright must appear as follows on the title page or copyright page of printed works quoting from the ESV, or in a corresponding location when the ESV is quoted in other media: “Scripture quotations are from the ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.” When more than one translation is quoted in printed works or another media, the foregoing notice of copyright should begin as follows: “Unless Otherwise indicated, all Scriptures are from ... [etc.]”, or, “Scripture quotations marked ESV are from ... [etc.].” The “ESV” and “English Standard Version” are registered trademarks of Good News Publishers. Use of either trademark beyond the use described in this Permission Notice requires the permission of Good News Publishers. When quotations from the ESV text are used in non-saleable media, such as church bulletins, orders of services, posters, transparencies, or similar media, a complete copyright notice is not required, but the initials (ESV) must appear at the end of a quotation. Publication of any commentary or other Biblical reference work produced for commercial sale that uses the English Standard Version must include written permission for the use of the ESV text. Permission requests that exceed the above guidelines must be directed to: Good News Publishers, Attn: Bible Rights, 1300 Crescent Street, Wheaton, Ill. 60187. Permission requests for use within the UK and EU that exceed the above guidelines must be directed to: HarperCollins Religious, 77-85 Fulham Palace Road, Hammersmith, London, W6 8JB, England.
Published by Good News Publishers Good News Publishers (including Crossway Bibles) is a not-for-profit organization that exists solely for the purpose of publishing the good news of the gospel and the truth of God's Word, the Bible. |
Support Info | esv |


Bibliography
Beker, J. Christiaan. Paul the Apostle: The Triumph of God in Life and Thought. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980.
Bornkamm, Günther. “The Letter to the Romans as Paul’s Last Will and Testament.” Pages 16–28 in The Romans Debate. Rev. enl. ed. Edited by Karl P. Donfried. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1991.
Borse, Udo. “Schlußwort des Römerbriefes: Segensgruß (16,24) statt Doxologie (VV.25–27).” Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 19 (1994): 173–78.
Campbell, Douglas A. The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.
———. “Determining the Gospel through Rhetorical Analysis in Paul’s Letter to the Roman Christians.” Pages 315–36 in Gospel in Paul: Studies on Corinthians, Galatians and Romans for Richard N. Longenecker. Edited by L. Ann Jervis and Peter Richardson. JSNT Supplement 108. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994.
Carson, D. A., Peter T. O’Brien, Mark A. Seifrid, eds. The Complexities of Second Temple Judaism. Vol. 1 of Justification and Variegated Nomism. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001.
———. The Paradoxes of Paul. Vol. 2 of Justification and Variegated Nomism. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001.
Collins, Raymond F. “The Case of a Wandering Doxology: Rom 16,25–27.” Pages 293–303 in New Testament Textual Criticism and Exegesis: Festschrift J. Delobel. Edited by A. Denaux. Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium 161. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002.
Cranfield, C. E. B., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. International Critical Commentary. 2 vols. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1975–1979.
Dahl, Nils Alstrup, and Paul Donahue. Studies in Paul: Theology for the Early Christian Mission. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1977.
Das, A. Andrew. Galatians. Concordia Commentary. St. Louis: Concordia, 2014.
———. “Galatians 3:10: A ‘Newer Perspective’ on an Omitted Premise.” Pages 203–23 in Unity and Diversity in the Gospels and Paul. Edited by Christopher W. Skinner and Kelly R. Iverson. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2012.
———. “The Gentile Encoded Audience of Romans: The Church Outside the Synagogue.” Pages 29–46 in Reading Paul’s Letter to the Romans. Edited by Jerry Sumney. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2012.
———. Paul and the Jews. Library of Pauline Studies. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2003.
———. “Paul and the Law: Pressure Points in the Debate,” Pages 99–116 in Paul Unbound: Other Perspectives on the Apostle. Edited by Mark D. Given. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2009.
———. “Paul and Works of Obedience in Second Temple Judaism: Romans 4:4–5 as a ‘New Perspective’ Case Study.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 71 (2009): 795–812.
———. “Paul of Tarshish: Isaiah 66.19 and the Spanish Mission of Romans 15.24, 28.” New Testament Studies 54 (2008): 60–73.
———. Paul, the Law, and the Covenant. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2001.
———. “ ‘Praise the Lord, All You Gentiles’: The Encoded Audience of Rom 15.7–13.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (2011): 90–110.
———. Solving the Romans Debate. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007.
Davies, Glenn N. Faith and Obedience in Romans: A Study in Roman 1–4. JSNT Supplement 39. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990.
Donfried, Karl P. “A Short Note on Romans 16.” Pages 44–52 in The Romans Debate. Rev. enl. ed. Edited by Karl P. Donfried. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1991.
———. “False Presuppositions in the Study of Romans.” Pages 102–24 in The Romans Debate. Rev. enl. ed. Edited by Karl P. Donfried. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1991.
———, ed. The Romans Debate. Rev. enl. ed. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1991.
Dunn, James D. G. Jesus, Paul, and the Law: Studies in Mark and Galatians. Louisville, KY.: Westminster John Knox, 1990.
———. The New Perspective on Paul: Collected Essays. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 185. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005.
———. Romans 1–8. Word Biblical Commentary 38A. Dallas: Word, 1988.
———. Romans 9–16. Word Biblical Commentary 38B. Dallas: Word, 1988.
———. “Romans, Letter to the.” Pages 838–50 in Dictionary of Paul and His Letters. Edited by Gerald F. Hawthorne, Ralph P. Martin, and Daniel G. Reid. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1993.
———, ed. Paul and the Mosaic Law. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.
Elliott, Neil. The Rhetoric of Romans: Argumentative Constraint and Strategy and Paul’s Dialogue with Judaism. JSNT 45. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990.
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. Romans. Anchor Bible 33. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.
Gagnon, Robert A. J. “Why the ‘Weak’ at Rome Cannot Be Non-Christian Jews.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 62 (2000): 64–82.
Gamble, Harry Y. The Textual History of the Letter to the Romans: A Study in Textual and Literary Criticism. Studies and Documents 42. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977.
Hays, Richard B. “ ‘Have We Found Abraham to be Our Forefather According to the Flesh’: A Reconsideration of Romans 4:1.” Novum Testamentum 27 (1985): 76–98.
Hurtado, Larry W. “The Doxology at the End of Romans.” Pages 185–99 in New Testament Textual Criticism: Its Significance for Exegesis: Essays in Honor of Bruce M. Metzger. Edited by Eldon Jay Epp and Gordon D. Fee. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
Jervell, Jacob. “The Letter to Jerusalem.” Pages 53–64 in The Romans Debate. Rev. enl. ed. Edited by Karl P. Donfried. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1991.
Jewett, Robert. “Paul, Phoebe, and the Spanish Mission.” Pages 142–61 in The Social World of Formative Christianity and Judaism: Essays in Tribute to Howard Clark Kee. Edited by Jacob Neusner, Peder Borgen, Ernest S. Frerichs, and Richard Horsley. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988.
———. Romans. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007.
Käsemann, Ernst, and Geoffrey William Bromiley. Commentary on Romans. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980.
Klauck, Hans-Josef. Ancient Letters and the New Testament: A Guide to Context and Exegesis. Waco, Tex.: Baylor University Press, 2006.
Klein, Günter. “Paul’s Purpose in Writing the Epistle to the Romans.” Pages 29–43 in The Romans Debate. Rev. enl. ed. Edited by Karl P. Donfried. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1991.
Kümmel, Werner Georg. Introduction to the New Testament. Rev. enl. ed. Translated by Howard Clark Kee. Nashville: Abingdon, 1975.
Lake, Kirsopp. The Earlier Epistles of St. Paul: Their Motive and Origin. 2nd ed. London: Rivingtons, 1919.
Lampe, Peter. From Paul to Valentinus: Christians at Rome in the First Two Centuries. Translated by Michael Steinhauser. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.
———. “The Roman Christians of Romans 16.” Pages 216–30 in The Romans Debate. Rev. enl. ed. Edited by Karl P. Donfried. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1991.
Lietzmann, Hans. Einführung in die Textgeschichte der Paulusbriefe an die Römer. 5th ed. Handbuch zum Neuen Testament 8. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1933. Repr., 1971.
Lightfoot, J. B. Biblical Essays. New York: Macmillan, 1893. Repr., Grand Rapids: Baker, 1979.
Longenecker, Bruce. W. Rhetoric at the Boundaries: The Art and Theology of New Testament Chain-Link Transitions. Waco, Tex.: Baylor University Press, 2005.
Manson, T. W. “St. Paul’s Letter to the Romans—and Others.” Pages 3–15 in The Romans Debate. Rev. enl. ed. Edited by Karl P. Donfried. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1991. Repr. from pages 225–41 in Studies in the Gospels and Epistles. Edited by M. Black. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1962.
Marshall, I. Howard. “Romans 16:25–27—An Apt Conclusion.” Pages 170–84 in Romans and the People of God: Essays in Honor of Gordon D. Fee on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Edited by Sven K. Soderlund and N. T. Wright. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999.
McDonald, J. I. H. “Was Romans XVI a Separate Letter?” New Testament Studies 16 (1969–70): 369–72.
Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Biblegesellschaft, 1994.
Miller, James C. The Obedience of Faith, the Eschatological People of God, and the Purpose of Romans. SBL Dissertation Series 177. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2000.
Moo, Douglas J. The Epistle to the Romans. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996.
Morris, Leon. The Epistle to the Romans. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988.
Nanos, Mark D. The Mystery of Romans: The Jewish Context of Paul’s Letter. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1996.
Nygren, Anders. Commentary on Romans. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1949.
Ollrog, Wolf-Henning. “Die Abfassungsverhältnisse von Röm 16.” Pages 221–44 in Kirche: Festschrift für Günther Bornkamm zum 75. Geburtstag. Edited by Dieter Lührmann und Georg Strecker. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1980.
Reichert, Angelika. Der Römerbrief als Gratwanderung: Eine Untersuchung zur Abfassungsproblematik. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 194. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2001.
Richards, E. Randolph. Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Secretaries, Composition, and Collection. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity, 2004.
Sanders, E. P. Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977.
Sandnes, Karl Olav. Belly and Body in the Pauline Epistles. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Schmithals, Walter. Der Römerbrief als historisches Problem. Studien zum Neuen Testament 9. Gütersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1975.
———. Der Römerbrief: Ein Kommentar. Gütersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1988.
Schreiner, Thomas R. Romans. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament 6. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1998.
Stowers, Stanley K. A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.
Stuhlmacher, Peter. Paul’s Letter to the Romans: A Commentary. Translated by Scott J. Hafemann. Louisville, KY.: Westminster John Knox, 1994.
———. “The Purpose of Romans.” Pages 231–44 in The Romans Debate. Rev. enl. ed. Edited by Karl P. Donfried. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1991.
Thorsteinsson, Runar M. Paul’s Interlocutor in Romans 2: Function and Identity in the Context of Ancient Epistolography. Coniectanea Biblica New Testament Series 40. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 2003.
Weima, Jeffrey A. D. “Preaching the Gospel in Rome: A Study of the Epistolary Framework of Romans.” Pages 337–66 in Gospel in Paul: Studies on Corinthians, Galatians and Romans for Richard N. Longenecker. Edited by L. Ann Jervis and Peter Richardson. JSNT Supplement 108. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994.
Wedderburn, A. J. M. The Reasons for Romans. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.
Zeller, Dieter. Juden und Heiden in der Mission des Paulus: Studien zum Römerbief. Forschung zur bibel 1. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1973.
(This article is based in part upon a previous edition of the “Romans, Letter to the” entry by Christian Locatell published in Lexham Bible Dictionary in 2012.)
A. Andrew Das
Rome (Ρώμη, Rōmē). Capital city of the Roman Republic and Roman Empire. Located in west-central Italy on the east bank of the Tiber River. The largest and most influential city in the known world by the time of Jesus’ birth.
Location and Dates of Existence
Rome was established in 753 bc as a formal city-state. Its history can be divided into three governmental periods: Regal (753–510 bc), Republic (510–31 bc), and Imperial (31 bc—ad 476).
The first century Roman historian Livy recounted that the location of Rome’s beginnings was chosen by the gods (History of Rome, 1.7). Rome originated in the plains of Latium with its seven famed hills: Cermalus, Palatium, Velia, Cispius, Fagutalis, Oppius, and Sucusa (compare Rev 13:1; 17:9). The hills and their marshy valleys made Rome difficult to attack. Its connection to the Tiber River provided fertile land for farming and herding, and its proximity to the Mediterranean Sea allowed for trade and easy access to the rest of the Mediterranean world.

![]() |
About The Lexham Bible DictionaryThe Lexham Bible Dictionary spans more than 7,200 articles, with contributions from hundreds of top scholars from around the world. Designed as a digital resource, this more than 4.5 million word project integrates seamlessly with the rest of your Logos library. And regular updates are applied automatically, ensuring that it never goes out of date. Lexham Bible Dictionary places the most relevant information at the top of each article and articles are divided into specific subjects, making the entire dictionary more useable. In addition, hand-curated links between articles aid your research, helping you naturally move through related topics. The Lexham Bible Dictionary answers your questions as they arise and expands your knowledge of the Bible. |
Copyright |
Copyright 2016 Lexham Press. |
Support Info | lbd |



