16. fornicator—(Heb 13:4; 1 Co 10:8).

or profane—Fornication is nearly akin to gluttony, Esau’s sin. He profanely cast away his spiritual privilege for the gratification of his palate. Ge 25:34 graphically portrays him. An example well fitted to strike needful horror into the Hebrews, whosoever of them, like Esau, were only sons of Isaac according to the flesh [Bengel].

for one morsel—The smallness of the inducement only aggravates the guilt of casting away eternity for such a trifle, so far is it from being a claim for mercy (compare Ge 3:6). One single act has often the greatest power either for good or for evil. So in the cases of Reuben and Saul, for evil (Ge 49:4; 1 Ch 5:1; 1 Sa 13:12–14); and, on the other hand, for good, Abraham and Phinehas (Ge 12:1, &c. Ge 15:5, 6; Nu 25:6–15).

his birthright—Greek, “his own (so the oldest manuscripts read, intensifying the suicidal folly and sin of the act) rights of primogeniture,” involving the high spiritual privilege of being ancestor of the promised seed, and heir of the promises in Him. The Hebrews whom Paul addressed, had, as Christians, the spiritual rights of primogeniture (compare Heb 12:23): he intimates that they must exercise holy self-control, if they wish not, like Esau, to forfeit them.

17. afterwards—Greek, “even afterward.” He despised his birthright, accordingly also he was despised and rejected when he wished to have the blessing. As in the believer’s case, so in the unbeliever’s, there is an “afterwards” coming, when the believer shall look on his past griefs, and the unbeliever on his past joys, in a very different light from that in which they were respectively viewed at the time. Compare “Nevertheless afterward,” &c. Heb 12:11, with the “afterward” here.

when he would—when he wished to have. “He that will not when he may, when he will, shall have nay” (Pr 1:24–30; Lu 13:34, 35; 19:42).

he was rejected—not as to every blessing, but only that which would have followed the primogeniture.

he found no place of repentance—The cause is here put for the effect, “repentance” for the object which Esau aimed at in his so-called repentance, namely, the change of his father’s determination to give the chief blessing to Jacob. Had he sought real repentance with tears he would have found it (Mt 7:7). But he did not find it because this was not what he sought. What proves his tears were not those of one seeking true repentance is, immediately after he was foiled in his desire, he resolved to murder Jacob! He shed tears, not for his sin, but for his suffering the penalty of his sin. His were tears of vain regret and remorse, not of repentance. “Before, he might have had the blessing without tears; afterwards, no matter how many tears he shed, he was rejected. Let us use the time” (Lu 18:27)! [Bengel]. Alford explains “repentance” here, a chance, by repenting, to repair (that is, to regain the lost blessing). I agree with him that the translation, instead of “repentance,” “no place for changing his father’s mind,” is forced; though doubtless this is what was the true aim of the “repentance” which he sought. The language is framed to apply to profane despisers who wilfully cast away grace and seek repentance (that is, not real; but escape from the penalty of their sin), but in vain. Compare “afterward,” Mt 25:11, 12. Tears are no proof of real repentance (1 Sa 24:16, 17; contrast Ps 56:8).

it—the blessing, which was the real object of Esau, though ostensibly seeking “repentance.”

18. For—The fact that we are not under the law, but under a higher, and that the last dispensation, the Gospel, with its glorious privileges, is the reason why especially the Hebrew Christians should “look diligently,” &c. (Heb 12:15, 16).

are not come—Greek, “have not come near to.” Alluding to De 4:11, “Ye came near and stood under the mountain; and the mountain burned with fire … with darkness, clouds, and thick darkness.” “In your coming near unto God, it has not been to,” &c.

the mount—The oldest manuscripts and Vulgate omit “the mount.” But still, “the mount” must be supplied from Heb 12:22.

that might be touched—palpable and material. Not that any save Moses was allowed to touch it (Ex 19:12, 13). The Hebrews drew near to the material Mount Sinai with material bodies; we, to the spiritual mount in the spirit. The “darkness” was that formed by the clouds hanging round the mount; the “tempest” accompanied the thunder.

19. trumpet—to rouse attention, and herald God’s approach (Ex 19:16).

entreated that the word should not be spoken—literally, “that speech should not be added to them”; not that they refused to hear the word of God, but they wished that God should not Himself speak, but employ Moses as His mediating spokesman. “The voice of words” was the Decalogue, spoken by God Himself, a voice issuing forth, without any form being seen: after which “He added no more” (De 5:22).

20. that which was commanded—“the interdict” [Tittmann]. A stern interdictory mandate is meant.

And—rather, “Even if a beast (much more a man) touch,” &c.

or thrust through with a dart—omitted in the oldest manuscripts. The full interdict in Ex 19:12, 13 is abbreviated here; the beast alone, being put for “whether man or beast”; the stoning, which applies to the human offender, alone being specified, the beast’s punishment, namely, the being thrust through with a dart, being left to be understood.

21. the sight—the vision of God’s majesty.

quake—Greek, “I am in trembling”; “fear” affected his mind: “trembling,” his body. Moses is not recorded in Exodus to have used these words. But Paul, by inspiration, supplies (compare Ac 20:35; 2 Ti 3:8) this detail. We read in De 9:19, Septuagint, of similar words used by Moses after breaking the two tables, through fear of God’s anger at the people’s sin in making the golden calves. He doubtless similarly “feared” in hearing the ten commandments spoken by the voice of Jehovah.

22. are come—Greek, “have come near unto” (compare De 4:11). Not merely, ye shall come, but, ye have already come.

Mount Sion—antitypical Sion, the heavenly Jerusalem, of which the spiritual invisible Church (of which the first foundation was laid in literal Zion, Jn 12:15; 1 Pe 2:6) is now the earnest; and of which the restored literal Jerusalem hereafter shall be the earthly representative, to be succeeded by the everlasting and “new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven” (Rev 21:2–27; compare Heb 11:10).

22, 23. to an innumerable company of angels, to the general assembly and church—The city of God having been mentioned, the mention of its citizens follows. Believers being like the angels (Job 1:6; 38:7), “sons of God,” are so their “equals” (Lu 20:36); and being reconciled through Christ, are adopted into God’s great and blessed family. For the full completion of this we pray (Mt 6:10). English Version arrangement is opposed: (1) by “and” always beginning each new member of the whole sentence; (2) “general assembly and Church,” form a kind of tautology; (3) “general assembly,” or rather, “festal full assembly,” “the jubilant full company” (such as were the Olympic games, celebrated with joyous singing, dancing, &c.), applies better to the angels above, ever hymning God’s praises, than to the Church, of which a considerable part is now militant on earth. Translate therefore, “to myriads (ten thousands, compare De 33:2; Ps 68:17; Da 7:10; Jud 1:14; namely), the full festal assembly of angels, and the Church of the first-born.” Angels and saints together constitute the ten thousands. Compare “all angels, all nations” Mt 25:31, 32. Messiah is pre-eminently “the First-born,” or “First-begotten” (Heb 1:6), and all believers become so by adoption. Compare the type, Nu 3:12, 45, 50; 1 Pe 1:18. As the kingly and priestly succession was in the first-born, and as Israel was God’s “first-born” (Ex 4:22; compare Ex 13:2), and a “kingdom of priests” to God (Ex 19:6), so believers (Rev 1:6).

23. written in heaven—enrolled as citizens there. All those who at the coming of “God the Judge of all” (which clause therefore naturally follows), shall be found “written in heaven,” that is, in the Lamb’s book of life (Rev 21:27). Though still fighting the good fight on earth, still, in respect to your destiny, and present life of faith which substantiates things hoped for, ye are already members of the heavenly citizenship. “We are one citizenship with angels; to which it is said in the psalm, Glorious things are spoken of thee, thou city of God” [Augustine]. I think Alford wrong in restricting “the Church of the first-born written in heaven,” to those militant on earth; it is rather, all those who at the Judge’s coming shall be found written in heaven (the true patent of heavenly nobility; contrast “written in the earth,” Je 17:13, and Esau’s profane sale of his birthright, Heb 12:16); these all, from the beginning to the end of the world, forming one Church to which every believer is already come. The first-born of Israel were “written” in a roll (Nu 3:40).

the spirits of just men made perfect—at the resurrection, when the “Judge” shall appear, and believers’ bliss shall be consummated by the union of the glorified body with the spirit; the great hope of the New Testament (Ro 8:20–23; 1 Th 4:16). The place of this clause after “the Judge of all,” is my objection to Bengel and Alford’s explanation, the souls of the just in their separate state perfected. Compare Notes, see on Heb 11:39, 40, to which he refers here, and which I think confirms my view; those heretofore spirits, but now to be perfected by being clothed upon with the body. Still the phrase, “spirits of just men made perfect,” not merely “just men made perfect,” may favor the reference to the happy spirits in their separate state. The Greek is not “the perfected spirits,” but “the spirits of the perfected just.” In no other passage are the just said to be perfected before the resurrection, and the completion of the full number of the elect (Rev 6:11); I think, therefore, “spirits of the just,” may here be used to express the just whose predominant element in their perfected state shall be spirit. So spirit and spirits are used of a man or men in the body, under the influence of the spirit, the opposite of flesh (Jn 3:6). The resurrection bodies of the saints shall be bodies in which the spirit shall altogether preponderate over the animal soul (see on 1 Co 15:44).

24. new—not the usual term (kaine) applied to the Christian covenant (Heb 9:15), which would mean new as different from, and superseding the old; but Greek, “nea,” “recent,” “lately established,” having the “freshness of youth,” as opposed to age. The mention of Jesus, the Perfecter of our faith (Heb 12:2), and Himself perfected through sufferings and death, in His resurrection and ascension (Heb 2:10; 5:9), is naturally suggested by the mention of “the just made perfect” at their resurrection (compare Heb 7:22). Paul uses “Jesus,” dwelling here on Him as the Person realized as our loving friend, not merely in His official character as the Christ.

and to the blood of sprinkling—here enumerated as distinct from “Jesus.” Bengel reasonably argues as follows: His blood was entirely “poured out” of His body by the various ways in which it was shed, His bloody sweat, the crown of thorns, the scourging, the nails, and after death the spear, just as the blood was entirely poured out and extravasated from the animal sacrifices of the law. It was incorruptible (1 Pe 1:18, 19). No Scripture states it was again put into the Lord’s body. At His ascension, as our great High Priest, He entered the heavenly holiest place “by His own blood” (not after shedding His blood, nor with the blood in His body, but), carrying it separately from his body (compare the type, Heb 9:7, 12, 25; 13:11). Paul does not say, by the efficacy of His blood, but, “by His own proper blood” (Heb 9:12); not material blood, but “the blood of Him who, through the eternal Spirit, offered Himself without spot unto God” (Heb 9:14). So in Heb 10:29, the Son of God and the blood of the covenant wherewith he (the professor) was sanctified, are mentioned separately. Also in Heb 13:12, 20; also compare Heb 10:19, with Heb 10:21. So in the Lord’s Supper (1 Co 10:16; 11:24–26), the body and blood are separately represented. The blood itself, therefore, continues still in heaven before God, the perpetual ransom price of “the eternal covenant” (Heb 13:20). Once for all Christ sprinkled the blood peculiarly for us at His ascension (Heb 9:12). But it is called “the blood of sprinkling,” on account also of its continued use in heaven, and in the consciences of the saints on earth (Heb 9:14; 10:22; Is 52:15). This sprinkling is analogous to the sprinkled blood of the Passover. Compare Rev 5:6, “In the midst of the throne, a Lamb as it had been slain.” His glorified body does not require meat, nor the circulation of the blood. His blood introduced into heaven took away the dragon’s right to accuse. Thus Rome’s theory of concomitancy of the blood with the body, the excuse for giving only the bread to the laity, falls to the ground. The mention of “the blood of sprinkling” naturally follows the mention of the “covenant,” which could not be consecrated without blood (Heb 9:18, 22).

speaketh better things than that of Abel—namely, than the sprinkling (the best manuscripts read the article masculine, which refers to “sprinkling,” not to “blood,” which last is neuter) of blood by Abel in his sacrifice spake. This comparison between two things of the same kind (namely, Christ’s sacrifice, and Abel’s sacrifice) is more natural, than between two things different in kind and in results (namely, Christ’s sacrifice, and Abel’s own blood [Alford], which was not a sacrifice at all); compare Heb 11:4; Ge 4:4. This accords with the whole tenor of the Epistle, and of this passage in particular (Heb 12:18–22), which is to show the superiority of Christ’s sacrifice and the new covenant, to the Old Testament sacrifices (of which Abel’s is the first recorded; it, moreover, was testified to by God as acceptable to Him above Cain’s), compare Heb 9:1–10:39. The word “better” implies superiority to something that is good: but Abel’s own blood was not at all good for the purpose for which Christ’s blood was efficacious; nay, it cried for vengeance. So Archbishop Magee, Hammond, and Knatchbull. Bengel takes “the blood of Abel” as put for all the blood shed on earth crying for vengeance, and greatly increasing the other cries raised by sin in the world; counteracted by the blood of Christ calmly speaking in heaven for us, and from heaven to us. I prefer Magee’s view. Be this as it may, to deny that Christ’s atonement is truly a propitiation, overthrows Christ’s priesthood, makes the sacrifices of Moses’ law an unmeaning mummery, and represents Cain’s sacrifice as good as that of Abel.

25. refuse not—through unbelief.

him that speaketh—God in Christ. As the blood of sprinkling is represented as speaking to God for us, Heb 12:24; so here God is represented as speaking to us (Heb 1:1, 2). His word now is the prelude of the last “shaking” of all things (Heb 12:27). The same word which is heard in the Gospel from heaven, will shake heaven and earth (Heb 12:26).

who refused him—Greek, “refusing as they did.” Their seemingly submissive entreaty that the word should not be spoken to them by God any more (Heb 12:19), covered over refractory hearts, as their subsequent deeds showed (Heb 3:16).

that spake—revealing with oracular warnings His divine will: so the Greek.

if we turn away—Greek, “we who turn away.” The word implies greater refractoriness than “refused,” or “declined.”

him that speaketh from heaven—God, by His Son in the Gospel, speaking from His heavenly throne. Hence, in Christ’s preaching frequent mention is made of “the kingdom of the heavens” (Greek, Mt 3:2). In the giving of the law God spake on earth (namely, Mount Sinai) by angels (Heb 2:2; compare Heb 1:2). In Ex 20:22, when God says, “I talked with you from heaven,” this passage in Hebrews shows that not the highest heavens, but the visible heavens, the clouds and darkness, are meant, out of which God by angels proclaimed the law on Sinai.

26. then shook—when He gave the law on Sinai.

now—under the Gospel.

promised—The announcement of His coming to break up the present order of things, is to the ungodly a terror, to the godly a promise, the fulfilment of which they look for with joyful hope.

Yet once more—Compare Notes, see on Hag 2:6; Hag 2:21, 22, both of which passages are condensed into one here. The shaking began at the first coming of Messiah; it will be completed at His second coming, prodigies in the world of nature accompanying the overthrow of all kingdoms that oppose Messiah. The Hebrew is literally, “it is yet one little,” that is, a single brief space till the series of movements begins ending in the advent of Messiah. Not merely the earth, as at the establishment of the Sinaitic covenant, but heaven also is to be shaken. The two advents of Messiah are regarded as one, the complete shaking belonging to the second advent, of which the presage was given in the shakings at the first advent: the convulsions connected with the overthrow of Jerusalem shadowing forth those about to be at the overthrow of all the God-opposed kingdoms by the coming Messiah.

27. this word, Yet once more—So Paul, by the Spirit, sanctions the Septuagint rendering of Hag 2:6, giving an additional feature to the prophecy in the Hebrew, as rendered in English Version, not merely that it shall be in a little while, but that it is to be “once more” as the final act. The stress of his argument is on the “once.” Once for all; once and for ever. “In saying ‘once more,’ the Spirit implies that something has already passed, and something else shall be which is to remain, and is no more to be changed to something else; for the once is exclusive, that is, not many times” [Estius].

those things that are shaken—the heaven and the earth. As the shaking is to be total, so shall the removal be, making way for the better things that are unremovable. Compare the Jewish economy (the type of the whole present order of things) giving way to the new and abiding covenant: the forerunner of the everlasting state of bliss.

as of things … made—namely, of this present visible creation: compare 2 Co 5:1; Heb 9:11, “made with hands … of this creation,” that is, things so made at creation that they would not remain of themselves, but be removed. The new abiding heaven and earth are also made by God, but they are of a higher nature than the material creation, being made to partake of the divine nature of Him who is not made: so in this relation, as one with the uncreated God, they are regarded as not of the same class as the things made. The things made in the former sense do not remain; the things of the new heaven and earth, like the uncreated God, “shall remain before God” (Is 66:22). The Spirit, the seed of the new and heavenly being, not only of the believer’s soul, but also of the future body, is an uncreated and immortal principle.

28. receiving—as we do, in prospect and sure hope, also in the possession of the Spirit the first-fruits. This is our privilege as Christians.

let us have grace—“let us have thankfulness” [Alford after Chrysostom]. But (1) this translation is according to classical Greek, not Paul’s phraseology for “to be thankful.” (2) “To God” would have been in that case added. (3) “Whereby we may serve God,” suits the English Version “grace” (that is Gospel grace, the work of the Spirit, producing faith exhibited in serving God), but does not suit “thankfulness.”

acceptably—Greek, “well-pleasingly.”

reverence and godly fear—The oldest manuscripts read, “reverent caution and fear.” Reverent caution (same Greek as in Heb 5:7; see on Heb 5:7) lest we should offend God, who is of purer eyes than to behold iniquity. Fear lest we should bring destruction on ourselves.

29. Greek, “For even”: “for also”; introducing an additional solemn incentive to diligence. Quoted from De 4:24.

our God—in whom we hope, is also to be feared. He is love (1 Jn 4:8, 16); yet there is another side of His character; God has wrath against sin (Heb 10:27, 31).