CHAPTER 34

Ez 34:1–31. Reproof of the False Shepherds; Promise of the True and Good Shepherd.

Having in the thirty-third chapter laid down repentance as the necessary preliminary to happier times for the people, He now promises the removal of the false shepherds as preparatory to the raising up of the Good Shepherd.

2. Je 23:1 and Zec 11:17 similarly make the removal of the false shepherds the preliminary to the interposition of Messiah the Good Shepherd in behalf of His people Israel. The “shepherds” are not prophets or priests, but rulers who sought in their government their own selfish ends, not the good of the people ruled. The term was appropriate, as David, the first king and the type of the true David (Ez 34:23, 24), was taken from being a shepherd (2 Sa 5:2; Ps 78:70, 71); and the office, like that of a shepherd for his flock, is to guard and provide for his people. The choice of a shepherd for the first king was therefore designed to suggest this thought, just as Jesus’ selection of fishermen for apostles was designed to remind them of their spiritual office of catching men (compare Is 44:28; Je 2:8; 3:15; 10:21).

3. fat—or, by differently pointing the Hebrew, “milk” [Septuagint]. Thus the repetition “fat” and “fed” is avoided: also the eating of “fat” would not probably be put before the “killing” of the sheep. The eating of sheep’s or goats’ milk as food (De 32:14; Pr 27:27) was unobjectionable, had not these shepherds milked them too often, and that without duly “feeding” them [Bochart], (Is 56:11). The rulers levied exorbitant tributes.

kill … fed—kill the rich by false accusation so as to get possession of their property.

feed not … flock—take no care of the people (Jn 10:12).

4. The diseased—rather, those weak from the effects of “disease,” as “strengthened” (that is, with due nourishment) requires [Grotius].

broken—that is, fractures from wounds inflicted by the wolf.

brought again … driven away—(Ex 23:4). Those “driven away” by the enemy into foreign lands through God’s judgments are meant (Je 23:3). A spiritual reformation of the state by the rulers would have turned away God’s wrath, and “brought again” the exiles. The rulers are censured as chiefly guilty (though the people, too, were guilty), because they, who ought to have been foremost in checking the evil, promoted it.

neither … sought … lost—Contrast the Good Shepherd’s love (Lu 15:4).

with force … ruled—(Ex 1:13, 14). With an Egyptian bondage. The very thing forbidden by the law they did (Le 25:43; compare 1 Pe 5:3).

5. scattered, because … no shepherd—that is, none worthy of the name, though there were some called shepherds (1 Ki 22:17; Mt 9:36). Compare Mt 26:31, where the sheep were scattered when the true Shepherd was smitten. God calls them “My sheep”; for they were not, as the shepherds treated them, their patrimony whereby to “feed themselves.”

meat to all … beasts—They became a prey to the Syrians, Ammon, Moab, and Assyria.

6. every high hill—the scene of their idolatries sanctioned by the rulers.

search … seek—rather, “seek … search.” The former is the part of the superior rulers to inquire after: to search out is the duty of the subordinate rulers [Junius].

10. I will require my flock—(Heb 13:17), rather, “I require,” &c., for God already had begun to do so, punishing Zedekiah and the other princes severely (Je 52:10).

11. I … will … search—doing that which the so-called shepherds had failed to do, I being the rightful owner of the flock.

12. in the day that he is among—in the midst of (Hebrew) His sheep that had been scattered. Referring to Messiah’s second advent, when He shall be “the glory in the midst of Israel” (Zec 2:5).

in the cloudy … day—the day of the nation’s calamity (Joe 2:2).

13. And I will bring them out from the people, &c.—(Ez 28:25; 36:24; Is 65:9, 10; Je 23:3).

14. good pasture—(Ps 23:2).

high mountains of Israel—In Ez 17:23; 20:40, the phrase is “the mountain of the height of Israel” in the singular number. The reason for the difference is: there Ezekiel spoke of the central seat of the kingdom, Mount Zion, where the people met for the worship of Jehovah; here he speaks of the kingdom of Israel at large, all the parts of which are regarded as possessing a moral elevation.

16. In contrast to the unfaithful shepherds (Ez 34:4). The several duties neglected by them I will faithfully discharge.

fat … strong—that is, those rendered wanton by prosperity (De 32:15; Je 5:28), who use their strength to oppress the weak. Compare Ez 34:20, “the fat cattle” (Is 10:16). The image is from fat cattle that wax refractory.

with judgment—that is, justice and equity, as contrasted with the “force” and “cruelty” with which the unfaithful shepherds ruled the flock (Ez 34:4).

17. you, … my flock—passing from the rulers to the people.

cattle and cattle—rather, “sheep and sheep”; Margin, “small cattle,” or “flocks of lambs and kids,” that is, I judge between one class of citizens and another, so as to award what is right to each. He then defines the class about to be punitively “judged,” namely, “the rams and he-goats,” or “great he-goats” (compare Is 14:9, Margin; Zec 10:3; Mt 25:32, 33). They answer to “the fat and strong,” as opposed to the “sick” (Ez 34:16). The rich and ungodly of the people are meant, who imitated the bad rulers in oppressing their poorer brethren, as if it enhanced their own joys to trample on others’ rights (Ez 34:18).

18, 19. Not content with appropriating to their own use the goods of others, they from mere wantonness spoiled what they did not use, so as to be of no use to the owners.

deep waters—that is, “limpid,” as deep waters are generally clear. Grotius explains the image as referring to the usuries with which the rich ground the poor (Ez 22:12; Is 24:2).

19. they eat—scantily.

they drink—sorrowfully.

20. fat … lean—the rich oppressors … the humble poor.

21. scattered them abroad—down to the time of the carrying away to Babylon [Grotius].

22. After the restoration from Babylon, the Jews were delivered in some degree from the oppression, not only of foreigners, but also of their own great people (Ne 5:1–19). The full and final fulfilment of this prophecy is future.

23. set up—that is, raise up by divine appointment; alluding to the declaration of God to David, “I will set up thy seed after thee” (2 Sa 7:12); and, “Yet have I set My king on My holy hill of Zion” (Ps 2:6; compare Ac 2:30; 13:23).

one shepherd—literally, “a Shepherd, one”: singularly and pre-eminently one: the only one of His kind, to whom none is comparable (So 5:10). The Lord Jesus refers to this prophecy (Jn 10:14), “I am THE Good Shepherd.” Also “one” as uniting in one the heretofore divided kingdoms of Israel and Judah, and also “gathering together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and on earth” (Eph 1:10); thus healing worse breaches than that between Israel and Judah (Col 1:20). “God by Him reconciling all things unto Himself, whether things in earth or in heaven.”

David—the antitypical David, Messiah, of the seed of David, which no other king after the captivity was: who was fully, what David was only in a degree, “the man after God’s own heart.” Also, David means beloved: Messiah was truly God’s beloved Son (Is 42:1; Mt 3:17). Shepherd means King, rather than religious instructor; in this pre-eminently He was the true David, who was the Shepherd King (Lu 1:32, 33). Messiah is called “David” in Is 55:3, 4; Je 30:9; Ho 3:5.

24. my servant—implying fitness for ruling in the name of God, not pursuing a self-chosen course, as other kings, but acting as the faithful administrator of the will of God; Messiah realized fully this character (Ps 40:7, 8; Is 42:1; 53:11; Php 2:7), which David typically and partially represented (Ac 13:36); so He is the fittest person to wield the world scepter, abused by all the world kings (Da 2:34, 35, 44, 45).

25. covenant of peace … evil beasts … to cease … dwell safely—The original promise of the law (Le 26:6) shall be realized for the first time fully under Messiah (Is 11:6–9; 35:9; Ho 2:18).

26. them and the places round about my hill—The Jews, and Zion, God’s hill (Ps 2:6), are to be sources of blessing, not merely to themselves, but to the surrounding heathen (Is 19:24; 60:3; Mic 5:7; Zec 8:13). The literal fulfilment is, however, the primary one, though the spiritual also is designed. In correspondence with the settled reign of righteousness internally, all is to be prosperity externally, fertilizing showers (according to the promise of the ancient covenant, Le 26:4; Ps 68:9; Mal 3:10), and productive trees and lands (Ez 34:27). Thus shall they realize the image of Ez 34:14; namely, a flock richly pastured by God Himself.

27. served themselves of them—availed themselves of their services, as if the Jews were their slaves (Je 22:13; 25:14; compare Ge 15:13; Ex 1:14).

28. dwell safely—(Je 23:6).

29. plant of renown—Messiah, the “Rod” and “Branch” (Is 11:1), the “righteous Branch” (Je 23:5), who shall obtain for them “renown.” Fairbairn less probably translates, “A plantation for a name,” that is, a flourishing condition, represented as a garden (alluding to Eden, Ge 2:8–11, with its various trees, good for food and pleasant to the sight), the planting of the Lord (Is 60:21; 61:3), and an object of “renown” among the heathen.

31. ye my flock … are men—not merely an explanation of the image, as Jerome represents. But as God had promised many things which mere “men” could not expect to realize, He shows that it is not from man’s might their realization is to be looked for, but from God, who would perform them for His covenant-people, “His flock” [Rosenmuller]. When we realize most our weakness and God’s power and faithfulness to His covenant, we are in the fittest state for receiving His blessings.