Loading…

Creation in Six Days: A Defense of the Traditional Reading of Genesis One is unavailable, but you can change that!

Creation in Six Days offers an exegetical, literary, and theological defense of the traditional interpretation of the Genesis account of six-day creation. Jordan’s account is primarily designed to answer any approach to the text of Genesis, such as the increasingly popular Framework Hypothesis, that pits the text’s literary features against its historical and narrative sense. Beyond his...

because they have been adequately dealt with elsewhere and have few exponents any longer. The Gap Interpretation, also called the Ruin-Reconstruction Interpretation, is based on a misreading of the phrase “without form and void” in Genesis 1:2.6 Supposedly this phrase means that the world was in a condition of total chaos, an interpretation read back into the creation account from later passages that deal with sin and judgment. Thus, there is a time-gap between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2. Supposedly
Page 23