Loading…

A Commentary on Judges and Ruth: Commentary is unavailable, but you can change that!

This definitive commentary sheds exegetical and theological light on the books of Judges and Ruth for contemporary preachers and students of Scripture. Listening closely to the text while interacting with the best scholarship, Robert B. Chisholm shows what the text meant for ancient Israel and what it means for us today. In addition to providing perceptive comments on the biblical text, he...

As a basis for her proposal (note כִּי, “for”), Ruth appealed to Boaz’s status as a גֹּאֵל, “benefactor” (v. 9). We should probably assume the term has the same sense as in 2:20 (see our discussion above). If the term is used in a general sense of “deliverer, helper,” then Naomi simply identified Boaz as a relative and potential benefactor (cf. 2:20), and Ruth appealed to Boaz on the basis of this relationship (3:9). However, this does not fully explain Boaz’s response. He regarded Ruth’s proposal
Page 656