“revolting against the prophetic detail of dispensational premillennialism” by “discarding premillennialism along with the detail, and shifting toward an amillennial position.”21 For Henry, this was not necessarily a hopeful sign. “The writer’s own convictions are broadly premillennial, and he is not convinced that a discard of speculative accretions justifies an uncritical surrender of the whole premillennial structure,” Henry wrote. “If the shift to amillennial grounds is made on firmer convictions,