authority, Barth’s view of Scripture is seen to be seriously flawed. The high Christology of Barth has come under attack. First, it is viewed as a procrustean bed for the OT, as seen in Wilhelm Vischer’s commentary on Genesis. Second, the Christology seems to lead to universalism. As a correlate to the Christology, Barth’s rejection of natural theology is often interpreted as a rejection of natural revelation, and the dispute with Brunner on the imago Dei highlights this problem. Barth’s view of sin is also