Thomas J. Nettles I appreciate the clarity with which Dr. Pratt presents the Reformed view of sacramental baptism. As one would expect, his discussion includes much from the confessions of the Reformed tradition. At times, he seems to treat his confessional tradition much as Rome treats the magisterium of the Roman church. “To understand how baptism relates to covenant, we must delve further into Westminster’s theology,” he claims (p. 64). Surely “Westminster” is not a coauthority