^13:6Then he came to Simon Peter. Peter¹⁴ said to him, “Lord, are you going to wash¹⁵ my feet?” ^13:7Jesus replied,¹⁶ “You do not understand¹⁷ what I am doing now, but you will understand¹⁸ after these things.” ^13:8Peter said to him, “You will never wash my feet!”¹⁹ Jesus replied,²⁰ “If I do not wash you, you have no share with me.”²¹^13:9Simon Peter said to him, “Lord, wash²² not only my feet, but also my hands and my head!” ^13:10Jesus replied,²³ “The one who has bathed needs only to wash his feet,²⁴ but is completely²⁵ clean.²⁶ And you disciples²⁷ are clean, but not every one of you.” ^13:11(For Jesus²⁸ knew the one who was going to betray him. For this reason he said, “Not every one of you is²⁹ clean.”)³⁰

^13:12So when Jesus³¹ had washed their feet and put his outer clothing back on, he took his place at the table³² again and said to them, “Do you understand³³ what I have done for you? ^13:13You call me ‘Teacher’ and ‘Lord,’ and do so correctly,³⁴ for that is what I am.³⁵^13:14If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you too ought to wash one another’s feet.

Read in Logos

John 13:13: You call me Teacher and Lord, and you are right, for so I am.

Footnotes

13 Grk “with the towel with which he was girded.”
14 Grk “He”; the referent (Peter) is specified in the translation for clarity.
15 Grk “do you wash” or “are you washing.”
16 Grk “answered and said to him.”
17 Grk “You do not know.”
18 Grk “you will know.”
19 Grk “You will never wash my feet forever.” The negation is emphatic in Greek but somewhat awkward in English. Emphasis is conveyed in the translation by the use of an exclamation point.
20 Grk “Jesus answered him.”
21 Or “you have no part in me.”
22 The word “wash” is not in the Greek text, but is implied. Here it is supplied to improve the English style by making Peter’s utterance a complete sentence.
23 Grk “Jesus said to him.”
24 Grk “has no need except to wash his feet.”
25 Or “entirely.”
26 The one who has bathed needs only to wash his feet. A common understanding is that the “bath” Jesus referred to is the initial cleansing from sin, which necessitates only “lesser, partial” cleansings from sins after conversion. This makes a fine illustration from a homiletic standpoint, but is it the meaning of the passage? This seems highly doubtful. Jesus stated that the disciples were completely clean except for Judas (vv. 10b, 11). What they needed was to have their feet washed by Jesus. In the broader context of the Fourth Gospel, the significance of the foot-washing seems to point not just to an example of humble service (as most understand it), but something more—Jesus’ self-sacrificial death on the cross. If this is correct, then the foot-washing which they needed to undergo represented their acceptance of this act of self-sacrifice on the part of their master. This makes Peter’s initial abhorrence of the act of humiliation by his master all the more significant in context; it also explains Jesus’ seemingly harsh reply to Peter (above, v. ; compare Matt 16:21–23 where Jesus says to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan”).
27 The word “disciples” is supplied in English to clarify the plural Greek pronoun and verb. Peter is not the only one Jesus is addressing here.
28 Grk “he”; the referent (Jesus) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
29 Grk “Not all of you are.”
30 This is a parenthetical note by the author.
31 Grk “he”; the referent (Jesus) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
32 Grk “he reclined at the table.” The phrase reflects the normal 1st century Near Eastern practice of eating a meal in a semi-reclining position.
33 Grk “Do you know.”
34 Or “rightly.”
35 Grk “and I am these things.”