⁵⁴And they arrested him and^* led him^* away and brought him^* into the house of the high priest. But Peter was following at a distance. ⁵⁵And when they^* had kindled a fire in the middle of the courtyard and sat down together, Peter sat down among them. ⁵⁶And a certain female slave, seeing him sitting in the light and looking intently at him, said, “This man also was with him!” ⁵⁷But he denied it,^* saying, “Woman, I do not know him!” ⁵⁸And after a short time another person saw him and^* said, “You also are one of them!” But Peter said, “Man, I am not!” ⁵⁹And after^* about one hour had passed, someone else was insisting, saying, “In truth this man also was with him, because he is also a Galilean!” ⁶⁰But Peter said, “Man, I do not know what you are talking about!” And immediately, while^* he was still speaking, a rooster crowed. ⁶¹And the Lord turned around and^* looked intently at Peter. And Peter remembered the word of the Lord,^l how he said to him, “Before the rooster crows today, you will deny me three times.” ⁶²And he went outside and^* wept bitterly.

⁶³And the men who were guarding him began to mock^* him while^* they beat him,^* ⁶⁴and after^* blindfolding him they repeatedly asked^* him,^* saying, “Prophesy! Who is the one who struck you?” ⁶⁵And they were saying many other things against him, reviling him.^*

Jesus Before the Sanhedrin

⁶⁶And when day came, the council of elders of the people gathered, both chief priests and scribes, and they led him away to their Sanhedrin,^m ⁶⁷saying, “If you are the Christ, tell us!” But he said to them, “If I tell you, you will never believe, ⁶⁸and if I ask you,^* you will never answer! ⁶⁹But from now on the Son of Man will be seated at the right hand of the power of God.” ⁷⁰So they all said, “Are you then the Son of God?” And he said to them, “You say that I am.” ⁷¹And they said, “Why do we have need of further testimony? For we ourselves have heard it^* from his mouth!”

Read in Logos

Footnotes

*Here “and” is supplied because the previous participle (“arrested”) has been translated as a finite verb
*Here the direct object is supplied from context in the English translation
*Here the direct object is supplied from context in the English translation
*Here “when” is supplied as a component of the participle (“had kindled”) which is understood as temporal
*Here the direct object is supplied from context in the English translation
*Here “and” is supplied because the previous participle (“saw”) has been translated as a finite verb
*Here “after” is supplied as a component of the temporal genitive absolute participle (“had passed”)
*Here “while” is supplied as a component of the temporal genitive absolute participle (“was speaking”)
*Here “and” is supplied because the previous participle (“turned around”) has been translated as a finite verb
lSome manuscripts have “the Lord’s statement”
*Here “and” is supplied because the previous participle (“went”) has been translated as a finite verb
*The imperfect tense has been translated as ingressive here (“began to mock”)
*Here “when” is supplied as a component of the participle (“beat”) which is understood as temporal
*Here the direct object is supplied from context in the English translation
*Here “after” is supplied as a component of the participle (“blindfolding”) which is understood as temporal
*This imperfect verb is translated as iterative (“repeatedly asked”)
*Here the direct object is supplied from context in the English translation
*Here the direct object is supplied from context in the English translation
mOr “council”
*Here the direct object is supplied from context in the English translation
*Here the direct object is supplied from context in the English translation