Job 11:7–12

Footnotes

1. 16 The verb is מָצָא (matsa’, “to find; to discover”). Here it should be given the nuance of potential imperfect. And, in the rhetorical question it is affirming that Job cannot find out the essence of God.
2. 17 The word means “search; investigation”; but it here means what is discovered in the search (so a metonymy of cause for the effect).
3. 18 The same verb is now found in the second half of the verse, with a slightly different sense—“attain, reach.” A. R. Ceresko notes this as an example of antanaclasis (repetition of a word with a lightly different sense—“find/attain”). See “The Function of Antanaclasis in Hebrew Poetry,” 44 (1982): 560–61.
4. 19 The abstract תַּכְלִית (takhlit) from כָּלָה (kalah, “to be complete; to be perfect”) may mean the end or limit of something, perhaps to perfection. So the has “can you probe the limits of the Almighty?” The has: “have you come to the end of that which the Almighty has made?”
5. 20 The Hebrew says “heights of heaven, what can you do?” A. B. Davidson suggested this was an exclamation and should be left that way. But most commentators will repoint גָּבְהֵי שָׁמַיִם (govhe shamayim, “heights of heaven”) to גְּבֹהָה מִשָּׁמַיִם (gévohah mishamayim, “higher than the heavens”) to match the parallel expression. The may have rearranged the text: “heaven is high.”
6. 21 Or “deeper than hell.” The word “Sheol” always poses problems for translation. Here because it is the opposite of heaven in this merism, “hell” would be a legitimate translation. It refers to the realm of the dead—the grave and beyond. The language is excessive; but the point is that God’s wisdom is immeasurable—and Job is powerless before it.
7. 22 The verb יַחֲלֹף (yakhalof) is literally “passes by/through” ( “comes along” in the sense of “if it should so happen”). Many accept the emendation to יַחְתֹּף (yakhtof, “he seizes,” cf. Gordis, Driver), but there is not much support for these.
8. 23 The verb is the Hiphil of סָגַר (sagar, “to close; to shut”) and so here in this context it probably means something like “to shut in; to confine.” But this is a difficult meaning, and the sentence is cryptic. E. Dhorme (Job, 162) thinks this word and the next have to be antithetical, and so he suggests from a meaning “to keep confined” the idea of keeping a matter secret; and with the next verb, “to convene an assembly,” he offers “to divulge it.”
9. 24 The pronoun “you” is not in the Hebrew text but has been supplied in the translation.
10. 25 The denominative Hiphil of קָהָל (qahal, “an assembly”) has the idea of “to convene an assembly.” In this context there would be the legal sense of convening a court, i.e., calling Job to account (D. J. A. Clines, Job [], ). See E. Ullendorff, “The Meaning of QHLT,” 12 (1962): 215; he defines the verb also as “argue, rebuke.”
11. 26 The verb means “turn him back.” Zophar uses Job’s own words (see 9:12).
12. 27 The pronoun is emphatic implying that Zophar indicates that God indeed knows Job’s sin even if Job does not.
13. 28 The expression is literally “men of emptiness” (see Ps 26:4). These are false men, for שָׁוְא (shavé’) can mean “vain, empty, or false, deceitful.”
14. 29 E. Dhorme (Job, 162) reads the prepositional phrase “to him” rather than the negative; he translates the line as “he sees iniquity and observes it closely.”
15. 30 Some commentators do not take this last clause as a question, but simply as a statement, namely, that when God sees evil he does not need to ponder or consider it—he knows it instantly. In that case it would be a circumstantial clause: “without considering it.” D. J. A. Clines lists quite an array of other interpretations for the line (Job [], ); for example, “and he is himself unobserved”; taking the word לֹא (lo’) as an emphatic; taking the negative as a noun, “considering them as nothing”; and others that change the verb to “they do not understand it.” But none of these are compelling; they offer no major improvement.
16. 31 As A. B. Davidson (Job, 84) says, the one thing will happen when the other happens—which is never. The word “empty” נָבוּב (navuv) means “hollow; witless,” and “become wise” (יִלָּבֵב, yillavev) is “will get heart” (not to “lack heart” as Driver suggested”). Many commentators do not like the last line of the verse, and so offer even more emendations. E. F. Sutcliffe wanted to change פֶּרֶא (pere’, “donkey”) to פֶּרֶד (pered, “stallion”), rendering “a witless wight may get wit when a mule is born a stallion” (“Notes on Job, textual and exegetical,” 30 [1949]: 70–71); and others approached the verse by changing the verb from יִוָּלֵד (yivvaled, “is born”) to יִלָּמֵד (yillamed, “is taught”), resulting in “a hollow man may get understanding, and a wild donkey’s colt may be taught [= tamed]” (cf. ).