^7:18At that time³⁷ the Lord will whistle for flies from the distant streams of Egypt and for bees from the land of Assyria.³⁸^7:19All of them will come and make their home³⁹ in the ravines between the cliffs, and in the crevices of the cliffs, in all the thorn bushes, and in all the watering holes.⁴⁰^7:20At that time⁴¹ the sovereign master will use a razor hired from the banks of the Euphrates River,⁴² the king of Assyria, to shave the head and the pubic hair;⁴³ it will also shave off the beard. ^7:21At that time⁴⁴ a man will keep alive a young cow from the herd and a couple of goats. ^7:22From the abundance of milk they produce,⁴⁵ he will have sour milk for his meals. Indeed, everyone left in the heart of the land will eat sour milk and honey. ^7:23At that time⁴⁶ every place where there had been a thousand vines worth a thousand shekels will be overrun⁴⁷ with thorns and briers. ^7:24With bow and arrow⁴⁸ men will hunt⁴⁹ there, for the whole land will be covered⁵⁰ with thorns and briers. ^7:25They will stay away from all the hills that were cultivated, for fear of the thorns and briers.⁵¹ Cattle will graze there and sheep will trample on them.⁵²

Read in Logos

Footnotes

37 Heb “in that day” (so ). The verb that introduces this verse serves as a discourse particle and is untranslated; see note on “in the future” in .
38 Swarming flies are irritating; bees are irritating and especially dangerous because of the pain they inflict with their sting (see Deut 1:44; Ps 118:12). The metaphors are well chosen, for the Assyrians (symbolized by the bees) were much more powerful and dangerous than the Egyptians (symbolized by the flies). Nevertheless both would put pressure on Judah, for Egypt wanted Judah as a buffer state against Assyrian aggression, while Assyrian wanted it as a base for operations against Egypt. Following the reference to sour milk and honey, the metaphor is especially apt, for flies are attracted to dairy products and bees can be found in the vicinity of honey.
39 Heb “and shall rest” (so , ); , , “and settle.”
40 The meaning of this word (נַהֲלֹל, nahalol) is uncertain; some understand this as referring to another type of thorn bush. For bibliography, see I *נַהֲלֹל.
41 Heb “in that day” (so , ); “In the same day.”
42 Heb “the river” (so ); “the Euphrates.” The name of the river has been supplied in the present translation for clarity.
43 Heb “the hair of the feet.” The translation assumes that the word “feet” is used here as a euphemism for the genitals. See 920 רֶגֶל.
44 Heb “in that day.” The verb that introduces this verse serves as a discourse particle and is untranslated; see note on “in the future” in .
45 The verb that introduces this verse serves as a discourse particle and is untranslated, see note on .
46 Heb “in that day.” The verb that introduces this verse serves as a discourse particle and is untranslated; see note on “in the future” in .
47 Heb “will become” (so ); “shall be turned to.”
48 Heb “with arrows and a bow.” The more common English idiom is “bow[s] and arrow[s].”
49 Heb “go” (so , , ); “go hunting.”
50 Heb “will be” (so , ).
51 Heb “and all the hills which were hoed with a hoe, you will not go there [for] fear of the thorns and briers.”
52 Heb “and it will become a pasture for cattle and a trampling place for sheep.” At this point one is able to summarize the content of the “sign” (vv. 14–15) as follows: A young woman known to be present when Isaiah delivered this message to Ahaz (perhaps a member of the royal family or the prophetess mentioned in 8:3) would soon give birth to a boy whom the mother would name Immanuel, “God is with us.” Eventually Immanuel would be forced to eat sour milk and honey, which would enable him to make correct moral decisions. How would this situation come about and how would it constitute a sign? Before this situation developed, the Israelites and Syrians would be defeated. But then the Lord would usher in a period of time unlike any since the division of the kingdom almost 200 years before. The Assyrians would overrun the land, destroy the crops, and force the people to subsist on goats’ milk and honey. At that time, as the people saw Immanuel eating his sour milk and honey, the Davidic family would be forced to acknowledge that God was indeed with them. He was present with them in the Syrian-Israelite crisis, fully capable of rescuing them; but he was also present with them in judgment, disciplining them for their lack of trust. The moral of the story is quite clear: Failure to appropriate God’s promises by faith can turn potential blessing into disciplinary judgment.