^29:26You are to take the breast of the ram of Aaron’s consecration; you are to wave it as a wave offering before the Lord, and it is to be your share. ^29:27You are to sanctify the breast of the wave offering and the thigh of the contribution,⁴¹ which were waved and lifted up as a contribution from the ram of consecration, from what belongs to Aaron and to his sons. ^29:28It is to belong to Aaron and to his sons from the Israelites, by a perpetual ordinance, for it is a contribution. It is to be a contribution from the Israelites from their peace offerings, their contribution to the Lord.

^29:29“The holy garments that belong to Aaron are to belong to his sons after him, so that they may be anointed⁴² in them and consecrated⁴³ in them. ^29:30The priest who succeeds him⁴⁴ from his sons, when he first comes⁴⁵ to the tent of meeting to minister in the Holy Place, is to wear them for seven days.⁴⁶

^29:31“You are to take the ram of the consecration and cook⁴⁷ its meat in a holy place.⁴⁸^29:32Aaron and his sons are to eat the meat of the ram and the bread that was in the basket at the entrance of the tent of meeting. ^29:33They are to eat those things by which atonement was made⁴⁹ to consecrate and to set them apart, but no one else⁵⁰ may eat them, for they are holy. ^29:34If any of the meat from the consecration offerings⁵¹ or any of the bread is left over⁵² until morning, then you are to burn up⁵³ what is left over. It must not be eaten,⁵⁴ because it is holy.

Read in Logos

Footnotes

41 These are the two special priestly offerings: the wave offering (from the verb “to wave”) and the “presentation offering” (older English: heave offering; from a verb “to be high,” in Hiphil meaning “to lift up,” an item separated from the offering, a contribution). The two are then clarified with two corresponding relative clauses containing two Hophals: “which was waved and which was presented.” In making sacrifices, the breast and the thigh belong to the priests.
42 The construction is an infinitive construct with a lamed (ל) preposition. The form simply means “for anointing,” but it serves to express the purpose or result of their inheriting the sacred garments.
43 This form is a Piel infinitive construct with a lamed (ל) preposition. It literally reads “for filling the hands,” the idiom used throughout this chapter for ordination or installation. Here too it has a parallel use of purpose or result.
44 Heb “after him”; , “after Aaron.”
45 The text just has the relative pronoun and the imperfect tense. It could be translated “who comes/enters.” But the context seems to indicate that this would be when he first comes to the tent to begin his tenure as High Priest, and so a temporal clause makes this clear. “First” has been supplied.
46 “Seven days” is an adverbial accusative of time. The ritual of ordination is to be repeated for seven days, and so they are to remain there in the court in full dress.
47 Or “boil” (see Lev 8:31).
48 The “holy place” must be in the courtyard of the sanctuary. Lev 8:31 says it is to be cooked at the entrance of the tent of meeting. Here it says it will be eaten there as well. This, then, becomes a communion sacrifice, a peace offering which was a shared meal. Eating a communal meal in a holy place was meant to signify that the worshipers and the priests were at peace with God.
49 The clause is a relative clause modifying “those things,” the direct object of the verb “eat.” The relative clause has a resumptive pronoun: “which atonement was made by them” becomes “by which atonement was made.” The verb is a Pual perfect of כִּפֵּר (kipper, “to expiate, atone, pacify”).
50 The Hebrew word is “stranger, alien” (זָר, zar). But in this context it means anyone who is not a priest (see S. R. Driver, Exodus, ).
51 Or “ordination offerings” (Heb “fillings”).
52 The verb in the conditional clause is a Niphal imperfect of יָתַר (yatar); this verb is repeated in the next clause (as a Niphal participle) as the direct object of the verb “you will burn” (a Qal perfect with a vav [ו] consecutive to form the instruction).
53 Heb “burn with fire.”
54 The verb is a Niphal imperfect negated. It expresses the prohibition against eating this, but in the passive voice: “it will not be eaten,” or stronger, “it must not be eaten.”