Logos Bible Study

Job 9:2–3

The NET BibleOther versions

English

Arabic

Czech

French

German

Hebrew

Hungarian

Italian

Korean

Latin

Portuguese

Russian

Simplified Chinese

Spanish

Traditional Chinese

9:2“Truly,1 I know that this is so.

But how2 can a human3 be just before4 God?5

9:3If someone wishes6 to contend7 with him,

he cannot answer8 him one time in a thousand.

Read in Logos

Footnotes

  1. 1 The adverb אָמְנָם (’omnam, “in truth”) is characteristic of the Book of Job (12:2; 19:4; 34:12; 36:4). The friends make commonplace statements, general truths, and Job responds with “truly I know this is so.” Job knows as much about these themes as his friends do.
  2. 2 The interrogative is used to express what is an impossibility.
  3. 3 The attempt to define אֱנוֹשׁ (’enosh) as “weak” or “mortal” man is not compelling. Such interpretations are based on etymological links without the clear support of usage (an issue discussed by J. Barr, Comparative Philology and the Text of the Old Testament). This seems to be a poetic word for “human” (the only nonpoetic use is in 2 Chr 14:10).
  4. 4 The preposition is אִם (’im, “with, before, in the presence of”). This is more specific than מִן (min) in 4:17.
  5. 5 The point of Job’s rhetorical question is that man cannot be justified as against God, because God is too powerful and too clever—he controls the universe. He is discussing now the question that Eliphaz raised in 4:17. Peake observes that Job is raising the question of whether something is right because God says it is right, or that God declares it right because it is right.
  6. 6 Some commentators take God to be the subject of this verb, but it is more likely that it refers to the mortal who tries to challenge God in a controversy. The verb is used of Job in 13:3.
  7. 7 The verb רִיב (riv) is a common one; it has the idea of “contention; dispute; legal dispute or controversy; go to law.” With the preposition אִם (’im) the idea must be “to contend with” or “to dispute with.” The preposition reflects the prepositional phrase “with God” in v. 2, supporting the view that man is the subject.
  8. 8 This use of the imperfect as potential imperfect assumes that the human is the subject, that in a dispute with God he could not answer one of God’s questions (for which see the conclusion of the book when God questions Job). On the other hand, if the interpretation were that God does not answer the demands of mortals, then a simple progressive imperfect would be required. In support of this is the frustration of Job that God does not answer him.

In other versions

ESVEnglish Standard Version

“Truly I know that it is so:

But how can a man be in the right before God?

If one wished to contend with him,

one could not answer him once in a thousand times.

NIVNew International Version (2011)

“Indeed, I know that this is true.

But how can mere mortals prove their innocence before God?

Though they wished to dispute with him,

they could not answer him one time out of a thousand.

CSBChristian Standard Bible

Yes, I know what you’ve said is true,

but how can a person be justified before God?

If one wanted to take him to court,

he could not answer God once in a thousand times.

NLTNew Living Translation

“Yes, I know all this is true in principle.

But how can a person be declared innocent in God’s sight?

If someone wanted to take God to court,

would it be possible to answer him even once in a thousand times?

LEBThe Lexham English Bible

“Truly I know that it is so,

but how can a human being be just before God?

If he wants to contend with him,

he cannot answer him one time in a thousand.

KJV 1900King James Version

I know it is so of a truth:

But how should man be just with God?

If he will contend with him,

He cannot answer him one of a thousand.