Zechariah 10:9–12

10:9 Though I scatter11 them among the nations, they will remember in far-off places—they and their children will sprout forth and return. 10:10 I will bring them back from Egypt and gather them from Assyria.12 I will bring them to the lands of Gilead and Lebanon, for there will not be enough room for them in their own land. 10:11 The Lord13 will cross the sea of storms and will calm its turbulence. The depths of the Nile will dry up, the pride of Assyria will be humbled, and the domination14 of Egypt will be no more. 10:12 Thus I will strengthen them by my power,15 and they will walk about16 in my name,” says the Lord.

11	tn Or “sow” (so KJV, ASV). The imagery is taken from the sowing of seed by hand.
12	sn I will bring them back from Egypt … from Assyria. The gathering of God’s people to their land in eschatological times will be like a reenactment of the exodus, but this time they will come from all over the world (cf. Isa 40:3–5; 43:1–7, 14–21; 48:20–22; 51:9–11).
13	tn Heb “he,” in which case the referent is the Lord. This reading is followed by KJV, ASV, NAB (which renders it as first person), and NASB. The LXX reads “they,” referring to the Israelites themselves, a reading followed by many modern English versions (e.g., NIV, NRSV, TEV, NLT).
14	tn Heb “scepter,” referring by metonymy to the dominating rule of Egypt (cf. NLT).
15	tc Heb “I will strengthen them in the Lord.” Because of the perceived problem of the Lord saying he will strengthen the people “in the Lord,” both BHK and BHS suggest emending גִּבַּרְתִּים (gibbartim, “I will strengthen them”) to גְּבֻרָתָם (gevuratam, “their strength”). This is unnecessary, however, for the Lord frequently refers to himself in that manner (see Zech 2:11).
16	tc The LXX and Syriac presuppose יִתְהַלָּלוּ (yithallalu, “they will glory”) for יִתְהַלְּכוּ (yithallékhu, “they will walk about”). Since walking about is a common idiom in Zechariah (cf. 1:10, 11; 6:7 [3×]) to speak of dominion, and dominion is a major theme of the present passage, there is no reason to reject the MT reading, which is followed by most modern English versions.