Time and the Biblical Hebrew Verb

The Expression of Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Biblical Hebrew

John A. Cook

Winona Lake, Indiana

Eisenbrauns

2012

Copyright © 2012 Eisenbrauns

All rights reserved.

www.eisenbrauns.com

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Cook, John A., Dr.

Time and the biblical Hebrew verb: the expression of tense, aspect, and modality in biblical Hebrew / John A. Cook.

pages cm—(Linguistic studies in ancient West Semitic; 7)

Includes bibliographical references and indexes.

ISBN 978-1-57506-256-3 (hardback: alk. paper)

1. Hebrew language—Tense. 2. Hebrew language—Verb.

3. Bible. O.T.—Language, style. I. Title.

PJ4659.C66 2012

492.4′56—dc23

2012038996

Contents

Preface

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations and Symbols

Chapter 1. A Theory of Tense, Aspect, and Modality

1.1. Pre-modern Treatments of Tense and Aspect

1.2. The R-Point and Modern Tense Theory

1.2.1. Jespersen’s Universal Tense Theory

1.2.2. Reichenbach’s R-Point Theory

1.2.3. Revisions of Reichenbach’s R-Point Theory

1.2.3.1. Hornstein: Reducing R-Point Redundancies

1.2.3.2. Bull: Multiple R-Points

1.2.3.3. Comrie: A Compromise R-Point Theory

1.2.3.4. Declerck: A Bifurcated R-Point

1.2.4. Summary: The R-Point and Tense Theory

1.3. A Primer on Aspect

1.3.1. Situation Aspect

1.3.2. Phasal Aspect

1.3.3. Viewpoint Aspect

1.4. The R-Point in Tense-Aspect Theory

1.4.1. M. R. Johnson: The Triadic Relationship of E, R, and S

1.4.2. W. Klein: The R-Point as “Topic Time”

1.4.3. Olsen: Multiple R-Points

1.4.4. Summary: The R-Point and Tense-Aspect Theory

1.5. The R-Point and Discourse

1.5.1. Explaining R-Point Movement with Viewpoint Aspect

1.5.2. Explaining R-Point Movement with Situation Aspect

1.5.3. Explaining R-Point Movement with (Un)boundedness

1.5.4. Summary: The R-Point in Discourse

1.6. A Primer on Modality

1.6.1. Backgrounds of Modality: Grammar, Logic, and Speech Acts

1.6.2. Defining Modality

1.6.3. Categorizing Modality

1.6.3.1. Classifications of Modalities

1.6.3.2. Modality and Speech Acts

1.6.3.3. Modality and Mood Systems

1.6.4. Conclusion: Modality and TAM Systems

1.7. A Model of Tense, Aspect, and Modality

1.7.1. Semantics and TAM

1.7.2. Time and Space: Temporality and TAM

1.7.3. Aspect and Event Time

1.7.3.1. Situation Aspect and Event Time

1.7.3.2. Phasal Aspect and Event Time

1.7.3.3. Viewpoint Aspect and Event Time

1.7.4. Tense and Unilinear Time

1.7.5. Modality and Alternative Times

1.7.6. The Interaction of Tense, Aspect, and Modality

1.8. Conclusion

Chapter 2. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Biblical Hebrew

2.1. A Primer on the Biblical Hebrew Verbal System

2.2. The Establishment of the “Standard” Theory of the Biblical Hebrew Verbal System

2.2.1. Before Ewald and S. R. Driver

2.2.2. Ewald’s “Standard” Theory

2.2.3. S. R. Driver’s “Extended Standard” Theory

2.2.4. Summary

2.3. The Biblical Hebrew Verbal System in Historical and Comparative Perspective

2.3.1. The Linguistic Context of the BHVS

2.3.2. East Semitic and the West Semitic Verbal System

2.3.2.1....

Content not shown in limited preview…
TBHV:ETAMBHV7

About Time and the Biblical Hebrew Verb: The Expression of Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Biblical Hebrew, Vol. 7

In this book, John Cook interacts with a range of approaches to perennial questions on the Hebrew verb. Some of his answers may appear traditional, such as his perfective-imperfective identification of the qatal-yiqtol opposition, but his approach is distinguished by its modern linguistic foundation. One distinguishing sign is his employment of the phrase “aspect prominent” to describe the biblical Hebrew verbal system. As with almost any of the world’s verbal systems, this aspect-prominent system can express a wide range of aspectual, tensed, and modal meanings. He argues that each of the forms can be semantically identified with a general meaning and that the expressions of specific aspectual, tensed, and modal meanings by each form are explicable with reference to its general meaning.

Cook eschews statistical means of validation, pointing out their weaknesses along the way, and draws on diachronic typology as an “external” means of validating his theory. These fields have provided a wealth of data on verbal systems and diachronic changes to these systems in the world’s languages. Given the inescapable diachronic dimension that is part of studying the ancient, composite corpus of the Hebrew Bible, diachronic typology is an especially suitable approach and a particularly useful means of escaping the subjectivity of translation-based statistical approaches.

After a decade of research and creative thinking, the author frames his discussion with the question, “What is the range of meaning for a given form, and what sort of contextual factors (syntagm, discourse, etc.) help us understand this range in relation to a general meaning for the form?” Although the general meaning may be an abstraction (just as a morpheme or phoneme is an abstraction), it gives us a better understanding of the array of specific meanings a form may exhibit and predicts the types of contexts in which these specific meanings may appear.

In order to account for the contextual character of specific meanings, Cook addresses long-standing issues involving interaction between the semantics of verbal forms and their pragmatic functions. More importantly, he proposes a theory of discourse modes for biblical Hebrew. These modes account for various temporal relationships that are found among successive clauses in biblical Hebrew. Fittingly, his account of this theory of discourse modes ends on an exegetical note with an explication of the interaction of verbs and their discourse context in two passages from the Hebrew Bible.

Cook’s brilliant work addresses old questions with a fresh approach that is sure to provoke dialogue and new research.

Support Info

tmbblclhbrwvrbx

Table of Contents