to the Colossians,
to Philemon
and to the Ephesians
F. F. Bruce
William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company
Grand Rapids, Michigan
© 1984 Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
255 Jefferson Ave. S.E., Grand Rapids, Mich. 49503
All rights reserved
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data:
Bruce, F. F. (Frederick Fyvie), 1910–1990.
The epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the Ephesians.
(The New international commentary on the New Testament)
Bibliography: p. xix
Includes indexes.
1. Bible. N.T. Colossians—Commentaries. 2. Bible. N.T. Philemon—Commentaries. 3. Bible. N.T. Ephesians—Commentaries. I. Title. II. Series.
BS2650.3.B78 1984 227 84-13785
ISBN 0-8028-2510-9
ii. Jewish Settlement in the Lycus Valley
iii. Christianity in the Lycus Valley
COLOSSIANS: TEXT, EXPOSITION, AND NOTES
iv. The Significance of the Letter
PHILEMON: TEXT, EXPOSITION, AND NOTES
i. Ephesians and the Pauline Corpus
ii. The Parousia and the Spirit
v. Nature and Purpose of Ephesians
EPHESIANS: TEXT, EXPOSITION, AND NOTES
INDEXES
In carrying out their policy of keeping the volumes of the New International Commentary up to date, the publishers and editor realize that, without such a policy, the adjective “new” as a description of the series would soon become absurdly irrelevant. As far as possible, they have preferred to entrust the revision of the earlier volumes to their original writers. Sadly, however, the death of some of those writers has made it necessary for others to undertake the revision or replacement of their contributions.
The commentary on Philippians and Philemon, which was published in 1955, was written by Professor Jacobus J. Müller of Stellenbosch, who died in 1977. When another scholar was invited to write a new commentary on Philippians, taking up a full volume by itself, it was decided to detach Philemon from Philippians and include it along with Colossians and Ephesians. There was indeed a notable precedent for presenting commentaries on Philippians and Philemon in one volume, by one author: that was Marvin R. Vincent’s work on these two epistles in the International Critical Commentary (1897). But there are even better precedents for linking Philemon with Colossians: one need look no farther than Lightfoot’s volume (1875).
The exposition of Ephesians ...
About The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon and to the EphesiansThis collection of three commentaries in one volume completes F. F. Bruce’s lifelong study of Paul’s writings. With the publication of this volume, Bruce—one of the most respected New Testament scholars in the world—finished writing commentaries on all the Pauline epistles except the Pastorals. According to Bruce, there are important reasons for linking Colossians, Philemon, and Ephesians together in one work. The study of both Ephesians and Colossians, says Bruce, confirms his belief that Ephesians continues the line of thought followed in Colossians—in particular because it draws out the implications of Christ’s cosmic role (set forth in Colossians) for the church, which is his body. At the same time Ephesians constitutes the crown of Paulinism, gathering up the main themes of the apostle’s teaching into a unified presentation sub specie aeternitatis. The letter to Philemon, too, has a close association to Colossians, and is appropriately included in this volume. |
|
Support Info | nicnt72col |